Mechanical Load Parameter Identification Using Frequency Response

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for identifying physical parameters of mechanical loads in speed- or position-controlled applications are limited by the need for parametric models, which are often unavailable, and automatic identification methods fail in difficult cases or only provide valid models in a limited frequency range, restricting control performance.

Innovation Solution

A method that allows users to interactively identify physical parameters of mechanical loads using a non-parametric frequency response estimate, guiding users through marking characteristic curve features without requiring special control engineering knowledge, and enabling refinement of each step in the identification process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If automatic identification methods are used to obtain physical parameters, then the identification process can be performed without user intervention, but the methods fail in difficult cases or only provide valid models in a limited frequency range

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation of parameter identificationVSAvoidreliability of parameter identification
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-identification by automatically analyzing measurement data to determine physical parameters of the mechanical load, eliminating the need for manual user input while maintaining high reliability through robust algorithms that handle difficult cases and broad frequency ranges

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Ease of manufacture

If parametric models are used for parameter identification, then the identification can be performed with available measurement data, but the models are often unavailable or require special control engineering knowledge

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of parameter identificationVSAvoidcomplexity of identification method
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex parametric modeling approaches with a non-parametric frequency response analysis method that directly processes measurement data to identify physical parameters, eliminating the need for users to possess specialized control engineering knowledge or construct complex models

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Device complexity

If limited frequency range models are used, then the identification process remains simple, but control performance is restricted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of identification methodVSAvoidcontrol performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adapts the frequency range of analysis based on the characteristics of the mechanical load and measurement data quality, allowing the identification method to maintain simplicity while automatically extending the frequency range when needed to achieve optimal control performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS10969755B2Semi-automatic, interactive tool to identify physical parameters of a mechanical load
Publication Date: 2021.04.06 ABB (SCHWEIZ) AG
  • US10969755B2 patent drawing
  • US10969755B2 patent drawing
  • US10969755B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method to identify physical parameters of a mechanical load includes the following steps: applying a first control signal to a mechanical device in a control circuit; measuring a first return signal; and using a power density spectrum of the first return signal to stipulate an excitation signal for the mechanical device.