Mechanical Part Wear Prediction Under Variable Aircraft Use Profiles

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods fail to accurately predict the wear of mechanical parts, such as aircraft turbomachines, and estimate operational risks associated with their ageing, leading to inadequate profitability estimation and risk assessment in aircraft contracts.

Innovation Solution

A method for predicting wear and uncertainty of mechanical parts by considering usage profiles and environmental conditions, using operational data to develop weighted models and statistical dispersion analysis, enabling precise maintenance cost estimation and risk assessment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If macroscopic estimation methods are used for maintenance costs and risk indicators, then the estimation process is simple, but the accuracy and reliability of profitability assessment deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomplexity of estimation methodVSAvoidprecision of maintenance cost estimation
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the mechanical part into multiple elements (e.g., turbine blades, compressor blades, disks) and creates separate wear prediction models for each element. This segmentation allows for more precise tracking of wear in critical components while maintaining manageable complexity through modular modeling approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by creating element-specific wear models that account for local environmental conditions and usage patterns. Each mechanical element has its own weighting coefficients and wear parameters tailored to its specific operational context, enabling precise cost estimation for maintenance activities targeting specific worn components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Measurement precision

If environmental conditions and usage profiles are considered in wear prediction, then the accuracy of wear prediction improves, but the complexity of data processing and model development increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of wear predictionVSAvoidcomplexity of prediction system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes parameters by introducing environmental condition parameters (temperature, humidity, contamination levels) and usage profile parameters (flight hours, cycle counts, load factors) into the wear prediction models. These parameter changes enable the system to adapt wear predictions to specific operational contexts without requiring complete model redesign for each scenario.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamics by making wear prediction models adaptive to changing environmental conditions and usage patterns. The weighting coefficients and model parameters are dynamically adjusted based on real-time or historical operational data, allowing the system to maintain high prediction accuracy across varying operational scenarios without static rigidity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If multiple element-specific models are developed for mechanical parts, then the reliability of wear prediction improves, but the time and resources required for model development and maintenance increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of wear predictionVSAvoidtime for model development
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by developing a library of pre-configured wear prediction models for common mechanical elements (blades, disks, bearings) that can be selected and adapted for specific applications. This preliminary model development reduces the time required for new project setup while maintaining reliability through proven modeling approaches that have been validated across multiple applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements universality by creating a framework where a single set of modeling principles and computational methods can be applied across multiple mechanical elements and different aircraft types. The element-specific models use consistent mathematical formulations and data structures, allowing the system to handle diverse components through a unified approach that reduces development overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS12492647B2Method for predicting the wear of a mechanical part, and method for determining the operational risk associated with an aircraft or with a fleet of aircraft
Publication Date: 2025.12.09 SAFRAN AIRCRAFT ENGINES SAS
  • US12492647B2 patent drawing
  • US12492647B2 patent drawing
  • US12492647B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for predicting the wear of a mechanical part and uncertainty of this prediction in a profile of use, the profile of use taking into account environmental conditions associated with environmental data and the time of use of the mechanical part under each of these environmental conditions, the method including determining operational data associated with a plurality of mechanical parts of the same type as the mechanical part; on the basis of the operational data determined, determining a plurality of predictive models of the wear of the part, the mechanical part being able to be divided into a plurality of elements, each element being modelled using at least one model of the plurality of models; and, for each model, determining a weighting coefficient, determining a wear prediction of the mechanical part, and determining a statistical quantity representative of dispersion of the predictions of the plurality of models.