Mechanical Vacuum Valve Layout for Low Run-Out Substrate Holders

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The complexity and heat-related errors in substrate holder devices used for bonding substrates in microelectronics and microsystems technology lead to increased run-out and reduced quality due to the need for multiple individually controlled vacuum paths and valves, which complicates the bonding process and limits the achievable lateral density of functional units.

Innovation Solution

A substrate holder device with a mechanical control valve that regulates multiple openings, reducing the number of components and heat input, allowing for controlled fixation and release of substrates with minimal run-out by influencing the bonding wave's shape and propagation speed.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If multiple individually controlled vacuum paths and valves are used in substrate holder devices, then the ability to control substrate fixation and release is improved, but the device complexity and heat-related errors increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesubstrate fixation and release controlVSAvoidnumber of vacuum paths and valves
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple vacuum paths into a single integrated vacuum system with one or two vacuum sources. The substrate holder includes multiple vacuum chambers that share common vacuum supply and exhaust paths, eliminating the need for multiple independent vacuum valves. This merging approach maintains the ability to control substrate fixation and release while significantly reducing device complexity and heat-related errors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Ease of operation

If multiple individually controlled vacuum paths and valves are used in substrate holder devices, then the ability to control substrate fixation and release is improved, but heat input and run-out increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesubstrate fixation and release controlVSAvoidheat input and run-out
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple vacuum control functions into a single vacuum system architecture. By using one or two vacuum sources shared across multiple chambers and eliminating individual vacuum valves for each path, the system reduces the total number of heated components. This directly reduces heat input to the substrate holder and minimizes thermal run-out during substrate bonding operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple individually controlled vacuum paths are used, then selective substrate release is improved, but the susceptibility to errors in the bonding process increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveselective substrate release capabilityVSAvoidsusceptibility to errors in bonding process
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the substrate holder into multiple independent vacuum chambers that can be individually controlled through a shared vacuum system. Each chamber can be independently vented or maintained under vacuum, enabling selective substrate release at different locations and times. This segmentation approach provides the adaptability of multiple controlled paths while using a simplified common vacuum infrastructure that reduces error susceptibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enhances the quality of the bond connection, reduces the susceptibility to errors, and increases the efficiency of the bonding process by minimizing heat input and run-out, thereby improving the precision and effectiveness of substrate bonding.

Implementation Method 1

a vacuum acting through the at least one connection or acting pressure can be provided at the at least two connecting openings in the region of the substrate holder surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVacuum: Vacuum

Implementation Method 2

Prebonding processes are processes in which two substrates are bonded together solely through van der Waals forces

Methodology Applied
Scientific Effectvan der Waals forces: Van der Waals Force

Implementation Method 3

Fusion bonding is the process of permanently joining two substrates through the formation of covalent bonds

Methodology Applied
Scientific Effectcovalent bonds: Chemical Bonding

Data Source

PatentEP4179564B1Substrate holder device, bonding apparatus and bonding method for substrates
Publication Date: 2024.08.07 EV GRP E THALLNER GMBH
  • EP4179564B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4179564B1 patent drawingFigure 3
  • EP4179564B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

The invention relates to a substrate holder device at least comprising at least one control valve and at least one substrate holder having a substrate holder surface and a substrate holder back surface. The invention also relates to a bonding device and to a method for bonding.