Media Aggregation System Synchronizing Multi-Source Video

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The proliferation of user-generated media content from various sources creates challenges in aggregating high-quality, synchronized, and relevant video files of the same event, as videos often vary in quality, angle, location, and audio, making it difficult for users to access a comprehensive and coherent view of the event.

Innovation Solution

A media system that includes identification, synchronization, analysis, and aggregation components to associate, synchronize, and rank media items based on time correlation, quality, and user-defined criteria, allowing for seamless playback and customizable aggregation of video and audio files, enabling users to view multiple files simultaneously or switch between them seamlessly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If multiple video files of the same event are collected from different sources, then the quantity of media content increases, but the quality and coherence of the aggregated output deteriorates due to variations in recording conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequantity of media contentVSAvoidquality and coherence of aggregated output
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the aggregation process into distinct functional components: identification component groups media items by event, synchronization component aligns them temporally, analyzer component evaluates quality metrics, and aggregation component combines selected portions. This segmentation allows each component to optimize its specific function, maintaining high quality while processing large quantities of diverse media content.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The analyzer component applies local quality assessment to different segments of media items based on specific criteria such as video quality, audio quality, and relevance. Rather than treating all media uniformly, the system evaluates and ranks specific portions (segments) of media items, selecting only the high-quality segments for aggregation. This ensures that the final aggregated output maintains high coherence and quality even when sourced from many different recordings.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Adaptability or versatility

If media items from different sources are aggregated, then the comprehensiveness of event coverage improves, but the complexity of synchronization and coordination increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomprehensiveness of event coverageVSAvoidcomplexity of synchronization and coordination
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The synchronization component acts as an intermediary that mediates between diverse media items with different timing references. It establishes a common temporal framework by correlating timestamps and aligning media segments to a unified timeline, enabling comprehensive event coverage from multiple sources without requiring complex direct coordination between all pairs of media items.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes temporal parameters (timestamps, time codes) of media items to a common reference frame during synchronization. The analyzer component also evaluates and adjusts quality parameters to ensure consistency. By standardizing these parameters across diverse media sources, the system achieves comprehensive coverage while managing coordination complexity through parameter transformation rather than complex structural arrangements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If automated analysis and ranking of media items is performed, then the efficiency of aggregation process improves, but the computational resources and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveefficiency of aggregation processVSAvoidcomputational resources and processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The analyzer component performs partial analysis by evaluating only the most relevant quality metrics and segments of media items rather than analyzing every aspect of every file in exhaustive detail. It ranks media items based on key criteria (video quality, audio quality, relevance) and selects only the top-ranked segments for aggregation. This partial action approach maintains high efficiency while reducing unnecessary computational overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The identification component performs preliminary grouping of media items by event before the more computationally intensive analysis and aggregation steps. This preliminary organization reduces the search space and allows subsequent analysis to focus only on relevant media items, improving overall efficiency while managing computational resources more effectively by avoiding redundant processing of unrelated content.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12033668B2Aggregation of related media content
Publication Date: 2024.07.09 GOOGLE LLC
  • US12033668B2 patent drawing
  • US12033668B2 patent drawing
  • US12033668B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for media aggregation are disclosed herein. The system includes a media system that can transform media items into one aggregated media item. A synchronization component synchronizes media items with respect to time. The synchronized media items can be analyzed and transformed into an aggregated media item for storage and/or display. In one implementation, the aggregated media item is capable of being displayed in multiple ways to create an enhanced and customizable viewing and/or listening experience.