Automated Digital Media Correlation via Metadata Mediation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current technologies lack automation in correlating and combining large, disparate digital media assets such as video, audio, and images, especially across different sources and platforms, and do not effectively utilize metadata for automated correlation and presentation.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for capturing and correlating digital media assets using metadata like date/timestamp and location, allowing for automated association, sharing, and presentation of these assets, either singularly or in combination, through a mobile client with enhanced networking capabilities and a web service platform.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If manual correlation and combination of multimedia assets is performed, then small-scale media integration is achievable, but automation and scalability are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation of correlation and combinationVSAvoidsystem complexity for metadata processing
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by automatically generating metadata tags during the media capture and upload process itself, rather than requiring manual tagging later. The system pre-processes media assets by extracting identifying features (timestamps, locations, event types) and associating them with metadata structures before the correlation phase, enabling automated matching without complex real-time processing during asset combination

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces metadata as an intermediary layer between disparate media assets. This metadata structure acts as a mediator that standardizes and correlates information from different sources (video, audio, images) without requiring direct complex interactions between the media files themselves. The metadata serves as a common language that simplifies the correlation process across heterogeneous media types

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If diverse media assets from multiple sources are correlated using metadata, then automated presentation is enabled, but data security risks increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveefficiency of data retrieval and analysisVSAvoiddata security across cloud providers
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing media assets into distinct portions and distributing them across multiple cloud computing providers. Each provider stores specific segments or types of media data, and the system correlates these segmented assets through metadata without requiring centralized access to all raw data. This segmentation reduces the security risk exposure at any single provider while maintaining correlation capabilities

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements local quality by allowing different cloud providers to have specialized security measures and infrastructure tailored to their specific roles in the distributed storage architecture. Each provider can optimize their security protocols for their specific data types and access patterns, rather than requiring a single uniform security approach across all providers, thereby improving overall system reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentEP3479226B1Data backup and transfer across multiple cloud computing providers
Publication Date: 2021.10.27 WHP WORKFLOW SOLUTIONS INC
  • EP3479226B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3479226B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3479226B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Data may be stored across the clouds of multiple cloud computing providers to improve data security. Software infrastructure components of an original cloud computing provider storing data via a first virtual machine (VM) may be identified. Software infrastructure components of an alternative cloud computing provider that is to store the data via a second VM may also be identified. A comparison is performed to determine components missing from the alternative cloud computing provider. Accordingly, configuration data may be created to cause a VM configuration utility to provision the second virtual machine with the missing components at a runtime of the second virtual machine. The configuration data and a command to activate creation of the second virtual machine on a cloud of the alternative cloud computing provider is sent to the VM configuration utility. Subsequently, a backup or a transfer of the data from the first virtual machine to the second virtual machine may be initiated.