Media Device Emission Reporting With Local Carbon Intensity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The challenge of accurately assessing greenhouse gas emissions associated with the display of media content is exacerbated by varying energy sources and consumption patterns, making it difficult for content providers and device manufacturers to report emissions accurately.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for determining carbon intensity based on local and temporal factors, using APIs and emission reports from display devices to generate precise emission data, which can be aggregated by content providers for Scope 3 reporting.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If content is distributed to multiple devices with different display technologies and power sources, then the reach and impact of content distribution increases, but the accuracy of greenhouse gas emission assessment deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent distribution reachVSAvoidemission assessment accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the emission assessment process by device type, display technology, and power source combination. Each device or device category is assessed independently with its specific emission factors, allowing accurate aggregation across diverse devices while maintaining individual measurement precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies location-specific and device-specific emission factors based on local power grid carbon intensity and device-specific display technology characteristics. This allows the assessment to adapt to local conditions (different power sources) and device qualities (different display technologies) rather than using a single average factor

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Quantity of substance

If emission reports are collected from multiple devices with varying power sources, then the comprehensiveness of emission data increases, but the complexity of aggregating accurate emission information increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveemission data comprehensivenessVSAvoidaggregation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses a universal emission report format that can accommodate different device types, display technologies, and power sources. The standardized structure includes device identifiers, energy consumption data, and location information that works across all device variations, simplifying aggregation despite data comprehensiveness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary processing layer that receives diverse emission reports from multiple devices, standardizes the data using consistent emission factors and calculation methods, and aggregates the information. This intermediary layer handles the complexity of varying power sources and device types through standardized processing protocols

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentEP4686209A1Device-reported carbon emissions
Publication Date: 2026.01.28 INTERDIGITAL CE PATENT HOLDINGS SAS
  • EP4686209A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4686209A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4686209A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Apparatuses and methods are described including techniques for assessing carbon emissions caused by the distribution and the consumption of media content. Techniques include determining a carbon intensity associated with a device displaying a video segment of a content received from a content provider, recording information indicative of energy spent by the device to display the video segment, and, then, transmitting an emission report generated based on the determined carbon intensity and the recorded information. Techniques further include transmitting content to devices, receiving emission reports, from those devices, corresponding to respective video segments of the content displayed by respective devices, and, then, aggregating information provided by the emission reports to obtain the emission amount caused by displaying, by the devices, at least a portion of the transmitted content.