Media Gateway IP Interface Differentiation for Call Handling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In 3GPP Rel4 mobile networks, the Media Gateway (MGW) cannot differentiate between A, Nb, and Mb IP interfaces, leading to restricted call handling capacity and unnecessary complexity due to the inability to provide interface-specific services and statistical information.

Innovation Solution

A control apparatus, such as an MSC server, determines the user plane interface type and transmits this information in a termination reservation message, allowing the MGW to process calls accordingly and optimize resource usage by separating different IP terminations/reference points.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the MGW treats all IP interfaces (A, Nb, Mb) uniformly without differentiation, then the device complexity is reduced, but the call handling capacity and service provision capability are restricted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecall handling capacityVSAvoidMGW complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the IP interface handling by introducing separate processing paths for different interface types (A interface, Nb interface, Mb interface). Each interface type has its own termination reservation handling mechanism, allowing the MGW to process each interface type with specialized logic rather than uniform treatment, thereby increasing call handling capacity while managing complexity through structured organization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by making the MGW behavior interface-type-specific. Different processing rules are applied locally to each interface type: A interface uses BSSAP signaling, Nb interface uses SIP-I protocol, and Mb interface uses SIP protocol. This allows optimized service provision for each interface type while maintaining overall system coherence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Adaptability or versatility

If the MGW does not know the type of reference point for reserved IP termination, then the device complexity is reduced, but the ability to provide interface-specific services is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterface-specific service provisionVSAvoidMGW complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary action by having the control apparatus (MSS) determine and indicate the reference point type before the MGW processes the termination reservation. The MSS includes the reference point type information in the termination reservation message sent to the MGW, allowing the MGW to prepare appropriate processing logic in advance based on the known interface type, thereby enabling interface-specific services without requiring complex real-time detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses the termination reservation message as an intermediary carrier that conveys reference point type information from the control apparatus to the gateway apparatus. This intermediary mechanism allows the MGW to obtain necessary interface type information without direct complex interaction or detection, simplifying the MGW's operation while enabling adaptive service provision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Use of energy by moving object

If all services are supported in all interfaces, then the adaptability is improved, but the resource utilization efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource utilization efficiencyVSAvoidservice support coverage
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by enabling the MGW to provide different service sets tailored to each interface type. Instead of uniformly supporting all services across all interfaces, the system provides A interface-specific services (e.g., speech enhancement functions) on A/Mb interfaces while providing Nb interface-specific services (e.g., DTMF delivery, fax tone detection) on Nb interfaces, optimizing resource utilization for each interface's specific requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements partial action by having the MGW provide only the necessary services for each interface type rather than all possible services. This selective service provision reduces resource consumption on interfaces where certain services are not needed, while maintaining full service capability where required, thereby improving overall resource utilization efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentEP2266291B1Different IP interfaces in a communication network system
Publication Date: 2018.09.05 NOKIA SOLUTIONS & NETWORKS OY
  • EP2266291B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2266291B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2266291B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A control apparatus (30,32) determines a user plane interface type via which a call is to be processed, indicates the user plane interface type in a termination reservation message and transmits the termination reservation message (2). A gateway apparatus (33,34) receives the termination reservation message, determines the user plane interface type from the termination reservation message and performs processing in accordance with the user plane interface type (3).