Interactive Media Guidance Relevancy Filtering

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Modern media guidance systems face challenges in providing users with efficiently relevant search results due to the overwhelming number of media content options, where many search results technically meet the criteria but are not what the user is looking for.

Innovation Solution

An interactive media guidance application determines and displays relevant search results based on personalization data and user preferences, using techniques such as relevancy thresholds, user behavior monitoring, and social recommendations to prioritize and visually distinguish relevant content.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If the guidance application displays all search results that meet the user's criteria, then the completeness of search results is improved, but the user is overwhelmed by the large number of results and cannot efficiently find what they are looking for

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of search resultsVSAvoiduser efficiency in finding desired content
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and displays only the most relevant search results based on personalization data and user preferences. The system identifies and separates highly relevant results from the complete result set, displaying a prioritized subset that eliminates overwhelming quantity while maintaining search completeness for users who need it.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different levels of relevance to different search results, with the most relevant results receiving prominent display positions and visual emphasis. This local differentiation in quality and presentation helps users quickly identify and access their desired content without being overwhelmed by the total number of results.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Loss of information

If the guidance application provides detailed search results from multiple content sources, then the comprehensiveness of information is improved, but the complexity of processing and presenting the information increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomprehensiveness of search informationVSAvoidcomplexity of search result processing
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces personalization data and user preference profiles as intermediaries between the raw search results and the displayed information. This intermediary layer filters, ranks, and prioritizes results based on user-specific criteria, reducing the complexity of information processing while maintaining comprehensive coverage of relevant content.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameters used to evaluate and present search results by incorporating user-specific weights and preferences. Instead of uniform treatment of all results, the system dynamically adjusts relevance parameters based on user behavior patterns and explicit preferences, simplifying the presentation while preserving information comprehensiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If the guidance application uses strict relevancy thresholds to filter results, then the precision of relevant results is improved, but the number of displayed results decreases below the minimum needed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of relevancy determinationVSAvoidnumber of displayed results
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic relevancy thresholds that adapt based on user feedback and interaction patterns. The system starts with higher precision thresholds to ensure quality results, then dynamically adjusts the threshold downward when the result count approaches minimum levels, maintaining both precision and adequate result quantity through continuous adaptation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates feedback mechanisms where user interactions with search results inform subsequent threshold adjustments. When users engage with lower-ranked results or indicate dissatisfaction, the system learns from this feedback and adjusts relevancy thresholds to maintain an optimal balance between precision and result quantity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS8285726B2Presenting media guidance search results based on relevancy
Publication Date: 2012.10.09 ADEIA GUIDES INC
  • US8285726B2 patent drawing
  • US8285726B2 patent drawing
  • US8285726B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for presenting search results based on relevancy in an interactive media guidance application are disclosed. After performing a user-initiated or automatic search for media content, the interactive media guidance application determines which of the hits are most relevant to the user. The guidance application then displays, or visually identifies, the relevant items. Some embodiments employ using different display arrangements based on the number of relevant items. Some embodiments display the relevant items in recommendation lists or hot lists.