Interactive Media Guidance Relevancy Filtering

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Modern content delivery systems face challenges in guiding users efficiently to desired media due to overwhelming search results, with many hits not meeting the user's intended search criteria, leading to irrelevant content.

Innovation Solution

An interactive media guidance application determines relevant search results based on personalization data and user interactions, using a relevancy threshold to filter and display only the most relevant content, which can be adjusted dynamically based on user inputs and day parts, and visually distinguished through various display methods.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If the guidance application displays all search results, then the quantity of information is maximized, but the user experience deteriorates due to overwhelming and irrelevant content

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of search resultsVSAvoiduser experience
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the most relevant search results from the complete set of hits by applying relevancy criteria based on user profile data, search criteria, and content attributes. This filtering process removes irrelevant content while preserving essential information, directly resolving the contradiction between providing comprehensive results and maintaining user experience.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different relevancy weights and criteria to different aspects of search results based on user preferences and context. By customizing the relevancy assessment for each user and search scenario, the system prioritizes locally important information while de-emphasizing less relevant content, thus improving ease of operation without losing important information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Measurement precision

If the guidance application uses strict relevancy thresholds, then the precision of relevant results is improved, but the quantity of displayed results decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverelevancy determination accuracyVSAvoidnumber of displayed results
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic relevancy thresholds that adapt based on user profile data, search context, and content characteristics. Rather than applying a fixed threshold, the system adjusts relevancy criteria dynamically to balance precision and quantity, ensuring that sufficiently relevant results are displayed while maintaining accurate relevancy determination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes multiple parameters simultaneously including relevancy weights, threshold values, and filtering criteria based on user preferences and search context. By adjusting these parameters dynamically, the system optimizes both the precision of relevancy determination and the quantity of meaningful results displayed for different user scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If the guidance application performs comprehensive relevancy analysis, then the quality of search results is improved, but the processing time and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesearch result qualityVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary analysis by pre-processing user profile data, search criteria, and content metadata to establish relevancy weights and criteria before the actual search execution. This preliminary preparation enables faster relevancy assessment during search operations, maintaining high result quality while reducing processing time for the actual search task.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the relevancy analysis into multiple independent components including user preference matching, content attribute evaluation, and contextual relevance assessment. By dividing the comprehensive analysis into separate manageable segments that can be processed independently and in parallel, the system maintains high search result quality while reducing overall processing time and computational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS7996399B2Presenting media guidance search results based on relevancy
Publication Date: 2011.08.09 ADEIA GUIDES INC
  • US7996399B2 patent drawing
  • US7996399B2 patent drawing
  • US7996399B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for presenting search results based on relevancy in an interactive media guidance application are disclosed. After performing a user-initiated or automatic search for media content, the interactive media guidance application determines which of the hits are most relevant to the user. The guidance application then displays, or visually identifies, the relevant items. Some embodiments employ using different display arrangements based on the number of relevant items. Some embodiments display the relevant items in recommendation lists or hot lists.