Media Guidance Application Verbal Command Authorization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing media guidance systems fail to effectively handle non-guidance verbal commands and ambient sounds by not considering user authorization and relationships when determining playback modifications.

Innovation Solution

A media guidance application that detects verbal commands from one user to another, compares them to a database of commands, and modifies playback based on user profiles, ranks, and characteristics to encourage the intended action, while ensuring authorized actions are allowed and unauthorized actions are prevented.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the system modifies playback in response to any detected sound or verbal command, then the system responds to all user inputs, but it cannot distinguish between authorized and unauthorized users to perform the action

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem response to verbal commandsVSAvoiduser authorization verification
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different response behaviors to different users based on their authorization status. Authorized users trigger playback modification, while unauthorized users do not, creating localized quality differences in system response based on user identity and permissions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts its response to verbal commands based on real-time user identification and authorization checks. The playback modification behavior changes dynamically depending on whether the detected user is authorized to perform the requested action.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of operation

If the system translates non-playback commands into playback modifications to encourage user action, then user interaction is enhanced, but the system complexity increases due to command interpretation and user profile analysis

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser interactionVSAvoidcommand processing system
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses a universal command processing mechanism that handles both traditional playback commands and non-playback verbal commands through a unified interface. The same audio detection and command interpretation infrastructure serves multiple purposes, reducing the need for separate specialized systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically analyzes user profiles, determines authorization status, and decides on playback modifications without requiring manual configuration or intervention. The command processing system self-adapts to user characteristics and automatically executes appropriate responses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If the system detects verbal commands and modifies playback to encourage intended actions, then media management is enhanced, but the difficulty of detecting and measuring user intent and authorization increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemedia management efficiencyVSAvoiduser intent detection
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses user profiles and historical data as feedback mechanisms to infer authorization status and intent. By analyzing patterns in user behavior and characteristics stored in profiles, the system can predict whether a user should be allowed to perform certain actions without requiring explicit verification for each command.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system pre-analyzes and stores user profiles, characteristics, and authorization rules before commands are issued. This preliminary preparation of user data enables faster and more accurate intent detection when verbal commands are received, as the framework for evaluation is already in place.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10135632B1Systems and methods for determining whether a user is authorized to perform an action in response to a detected sound
Publication Date: 2018.11.20 ADEIA GUIDES INC
  • US10135632B1 patent drawing
  • US10135632B1 patent drawing
  • US10135632B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are described for determining whether a user is authorized to perform an action that meets a goal of a sound. A media guidance application may detect a sound generated by a first device external to a media equipment device. The media guidance application may retrieve, from a lookup table, a known goal that is associated with the sound. The media guidance application may detect a user in a viewing environment. The media guidance application may determine an identity of the user, and may modify playback to encourage or discourage the user from achieving the known goal based on the identity of the user.