Media Processing Nodes Using State Metadata to Avoid Redundant Processing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Media processing units typically operate in a blind fashion, leading to unnecessary processing and degradation of media data when multiple units are scattered across a network, as they do not consider the processing history of the media data, resulting in redundant processing and quality issues.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of an enhanced media processing chain that allows media processing units to retrieve and validate media processing signaling and processing state metadata, enabling adaptive processing based on the state of the media data, thereby optimizing and predicting media processing outcomes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If media processing units operate independently without considering processing history, then device complexity is reduced and ease of operation is improved, but productivity decreases due to redundant processing and media quality degrades

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidproductivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback by having media processing units retrieve and validate processing state metadata from previous processing stages. This feedback loop allows units to adapt their processing based on the current state of media data, eliminating redundant operations while maintaining system simplicity. The feedback mechanism tracks processing history without adding significant operational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary action by embedding processing state metadata during earlier processing stages. This preliminary documentation of processing state allows subsequent units to make informed decisions without requiring complex real-time analysis, improving productivity while keeping individual unit operations simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Device complexity

If media processing units operate independently without considering processing history, then device complexity is reduced, but manufacturing precision decreases due to unnecessary processing and feature degradation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice complexityVSAvoidmanufacturing precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The feedback mechanism retrieves processing state metadata that documents the current state of media data. This feedback enables precision in processing decisions without increasing device complexity, as units simply query and respond to the documented state rather than performing complex real-time analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The processing state metadata acts as an intermediary that carries information about the current state of media data between processing units. This intermediary enables precise processing decisions without requiring complex direct communication between units, maintaining simplicity while improving manufacturing precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If adaptive processing with metadata retrieval is implemented, then productivity is improved by reducing redundant processing, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveproductivityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The feedback loop for retrieving and validating processing state metadata improves productivity by eliminating redundant processing operations. The complexity increase is minimal and localized to metadata handling, while the bulk of processing operations remain simple and efficient.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses copying by creating and maintaining processing state metadata that replicates the essential information about media data state. This copying approach enables adaptive processing without requiring complex real-time analysis, improving productivity while keeping device complexity manageable through simple metadata copy and compare operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS9842596B2Adaptive processing with multiple media processing nodes
Publication Date: 2017.12.12 DOLBY LABORATORIES LICENSING CORP
  • US9842596B2 patent drawing
  • US9842596B2 patent drawing
  • US9842596B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques for adaptive processing of media data based on separate data specifying a state of the media data are provided. A device in a media processing chain may determine whether a type of media processing has already been performed on an input version of media data. If so, the device may adapt its processing of the media data to disable performing the type of media processing. If not, the device performs the type of media processing. The device may create a state of the media data specifying the type of media processing. The device may communicate the state of the media data and an output version of the media data to a recipient device in the media processing chain, for the purpose of supporting the recipient device's adaptive processing of the media data.