Media Quality Quantification via Compression Artifact Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods fail to effectively quantify and differentiate the quality of media files, which can vary due to compression artifacts and other factors, affecting user experience and media management.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for analyzing media files to measure audio or visual quality by identifying compression artifacts and grading, generating quantitative data that can be used to rank and manage media files, including real-time quality assessment and metadata integration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If multiple copies of media files are stored in different formats, then media content availability and accessibility are improved, but quality differentiation and selection become more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemedia content availabilityVSAvoidquality differentiation
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the qualitative assessment of media quality into quantitative parameters by analyzing compression artifacts and grading metrics. This allows for precise measurement and comparison of quality across different media formats, resolving the contradiction by enabling quality differentiation through parameter-based evaluation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces subjective human quality assessment with automated computational analysis systems that measure compression artifacts and grading metrics. This substitution enables objective, precise quality measurement across diverse media formats without requiring manual evaluation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of operation

If subjective quality assessment is used, then user perception is considered, but objectivity and consistency in quality measurement are lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser perception considerationVSAvoidquality measurement objectivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces subjective human judgment with automated computational analysis that measures compression artifacts and grading metrics. This maintains objectivity and consistency while still capturing quality attributes that matter to user perception through algorithmic analysis of visual and audio characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces computational algorithms as an intermediary between subjective user perception and objective measurement. These algorithms translate perceptual quality attributes into quantifiable metrics, bridging the gap between user experience and measurable data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If comprehensive quality analysis is performed on all media files, then quality measurement precision is improved, but processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality measurement accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs quality analysis selectively rather than comprehensively on all media files. By applying quality measurement to specific files based on user requests or predefined criteria, the system achieves sufficient measurement precision without the excessive processing time and computational resources that would be required for complete analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent pre-calculates and stores quality metrics for media files during ingestion or in advance of user requests. This preliminary action allows for rapid quality comparison and selection at query time without performing comprehensive analysis on the fly, reducing processing time while maintaining measurement accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10341695B2Media management based on derived quantitative data of quality
Publication Date: 2019.07.02 AT&T CORP
  • US10341695B2 patent drawing
  • US10341695B2 patent drawing
  • US10341695B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, methods, and computer readable media for media management provide a derived quantitative data of quality for video media files. The method embodiment comprises receiving a request for a video media file, identifying one or more video media files associated with the request, measuring at least one audio or visual quality associated with each video media file by analyzing at least one of: compression artifacts or grading for the each video media file, generating quantitative data based on the measured at least one audio or visual quality for the each video media file, and returning the quantitative data associated with the each video media file. Other features include the ability to compare, archive, filter, sort and select video media files based on the quantitative data.