Media Recommendation Aggregation System for Cross-Provider Analytics

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Users are dissatisfied with individual content recommendation engines that operate in isolation, leading to incomplete understanding of user preferences and ineffective analytics due to limited information access, resulting in inaccurate recommendations.

Innovation Solution

A system that consolidates media recommendations from multiple content providers to generate combined recommendations by aggregating user-specific data, comparing metadata, and scoring recommendations based on importance values and frequency of recommendations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If multiple recommendation engines operate independently to gather user information, then each engine can maintain simple isolated operations, but the understanding of user preferences becomes incomplete and recommendation accuracy decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of user preference understandingVSAvoidcomplexity of recommendation system architecture
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple independent recommendation engines into a unified system that aggregates recommendations from multiple content providers. The system merges isolated recommendation data into a comprehensive user profile, enabling complete understanding of user preferences across different content sources while maintaining the operational independence of individual providers through standardized data aggregation protocols

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Productivity

If recommendation engines operate in isolation with limited information access, then system operations remain simple and manageable, but analytics effectiveness and recommendation quality are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveeffectiveness of analyticsVSAvoidcompleteness of user data
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal recommendation system that serves multiple content providers simultaneously while aggregating their recommendations. The system performs multiple functions: collecting recommendations from various providers, analyzing user preferences across all sources, generating personalized recommendations, and distributing them back to users. This multi-functional approach maximizes analytics effectiveness by utilizing complete user data from all content providers

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of operation

If individual content providers manage their own recommendations independently, then each provider maintains operational simplicity and control, but the overall recommendation system fails to provide comprehensive personalized recommendations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational simplicity of content providersVSAvoidaccuracy of media recommendations
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary recommendation system that acts as a mediator between multiple content providers and users. Individual providers continue to operate independently and send their recommendations to the intermediary system, which then aggregates and analyzes all recommendations together. This intermediary approach maintains the operational simplicity and independence of content providers while significantly improving recommendation accuracy through comprehensive data analysis

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS9256652B2Systems and methods for combining media recommendations from multiple recommendation engines
Publication Date: 2016.02.09 ADEIA GUIDES INC
  • US9256652B2 patent drawing
  • US9256652B2 patent drawing
  • US9256652B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are presented for combining media recommendations from multiple recommendation engines. In some embodiments, a recommendation system receives a first indication that a first media recommendation was generated by a first content provider, the first media recommendation being associated with a first media asset. The recommendation system receives a second indication that a second media recommendation was generated by a second content provider, and then determines whether the second media recommendation is associated with the first media asset. In response to determining that the second media recommendation is associated with the first media asset, the recommendation system generates a combined recommendation representing the first and second media recommendations.