Media Selection Interface with Adjustable Attribute Ratings

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for selecting content assets, such as those on YouTube or Netflix, are inefficient due to the abundance of irrelevant results from simple search techniques, requiring users to go back and forth to refine their searches, which is time-consuming and not user-friendly for the general public.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus that allow users to select items based on attributes with adjustable ratings, enabling users to refine their selections directly within the context of browsing, using a processor and interface to display attributes and allow rating adjustments, thereby selecting similar items based on user preferences without leaving the navigation context.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If simple text entry search is used, then ease of operation is improved, but measurement precision of search results deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of useVSAvoidsearch result relevance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-defines multiple attributes for each content item (genre, director, actor, duration, etc.) and assigns default importance ratings. This preliminary structuring of data allows the system to immediately perform refined filtering without requiring users to manually specify each parameter, thus maintaining ease of operation while improving search precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the importance ratings of different attributes based on user interactions and feedback. By changing the parameters (attribute weights) in real-time, the system can refine search results to better match user preferences without requiring users to understand complex search syntax or repeatedly adjust multiple parameters manually.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If complex input means with explicit preferences are used, then measurement precision of search results is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesearch result controlVSAvoidinput complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-configures multiple content attributes (genre, director, actor, duration, language, etc.) with default importance ratings before the user performs any search. This preliminary structuring allows users to immediately benefit from refined search results without needing to understand or configure complex parameters, thus reducing input complexity while maintaining high measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically manages the complexity of attribute weighting and search parameter optimization without requiring user intervention. It self-adjusts based on implicit feedback from user behavior patterns, thereby providing precise search results while keeping the interface simple and the input process straightforward for users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If implicit input means like browsing tracking are used, then measurement precision of user preferences is improved, but loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser preference accuracyVSAvoidtime to provide recommendations
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-structures all content items with multiple attributes and default importance ratings before any user interaction occurs. This preliminary preparation allows the system to immediately generate accurate recommendations based on user feedback without requiring time-consuming data collection or analysis phases, thus reducing time loss while maintaining preference accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses explicit user feedback (ratings, likes, dislikes) combined with the pre-structured attribute system to quickly refine and accurate user preferences. This feedback mechanism, combined with the pre-prepared attribute framework, enables rapid convergence to accurate preference modeling without the time delays associated with implicit tracking methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Measurement precision

If users must go back to refine search requests, then measurement precision of search results is improved, but loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesearch refinement accuracyVSAvoidtime to refine search
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-defines multiple content attributes with importance ratings that are immediately applicable to search results. Users can directly adjust these pre-configured attributes to refine their search without needing to navigate back to previous screens or re-enter search parameters, thus maintaining high measurement precision while minimizing time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system adds a new dimension to search refinement by allowing users to adjust attribute importance ratings directly within the search results context rather than requiring navigation to separate configuration screens. This dimensional shift in the user interface allows simultaneous viewing of results and refinement controls, eliminating back-and-forth navigation time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS10382819B2Method and apparatus for selecting at least one media item
Publication Date: 2019.08.13 KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS NV
  • US10382819B2 patent drawing
  • US10382819B2 patent drawing
  • US10382819B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Items having a plurality of attributes associated therewith, each of said associated attributes having a rating, the rating indicating the importance of the attribute to the user can be selected (201) and displayed (205) with its associated attributes and corresponding ratings. The ratings can be adjusted (207) and at least one item similar to one of the selected at least one first item is selected (209) based on the rating of at least one of the displayed attributes.