Mediated E-commerce Review System for Fraud Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

E-commerce websites face challenges in policing fraudulent product reviews and ratings, leading to shoppers relying less on reviews when making purchasing decisions, as fake reviews are difficult to detect and can significantly impact sales before being shut down.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus that transfers product information from an E-commerce website to user devices via a messaging channel, enabling a decision-support system to mediate conversations between shoppers and trusted reviewers for obtaining reviews and recommendations, which are then processed to provide a result to the shopper before a purchasing decision.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If E-commerce websites rely on user-generated reviews and ratings to help shoppers make purchasing decisions, then decision-making accuracy is improved, but the system becomes vulnerable to fraudulent reviews that compromise reliability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecision-making accuracyVSAvoidreview authenticity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary verification system that acts as a mediator between reviewers and the e-commerce platform. This system uses machine learning models to analyze review patterns, detect fraudulent behavior, and verify authentic reviews before they are displayed to shoppers. The intermediary layer filters out fake reviews while preserving legitimate ones, thus maintaining decision-making accuracy without compromising reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where reviewer behavior is continuously monitored and fed back into the verification system. Authentic reviewers receive positive feedback that encourages continued participation, while suspected fraudulent accounts are flagged for further review or removed. This feedback loop dynamically adjusts the reliability of the review system while maintaining its usefulness for decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If E-commerce websites implement strict policing measures to detect and remove fraudulent reviews, then review reliability is improved, but the complexity of the system increases and legitimate reviews may be lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereview authenticityVSAvoidpolicing system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual review policing mechanisms with automated machine learning systems. Instead of relying on human moderators to manually detect and remove fraudulent reviews, the system uses algorithms that automatically analyze review patterns, seller behavior, and account characteristics to identify fraud. This substitution reduces system complexity by automating the policing process while maintaining high reliability through intelligent detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent enables the review system to self-regulate through automated detection and verification mechanisms. The system monitors itself for fraudulent activity and automatically takes corrective actions such as flagging suspicious reviews or removing confirmed fraudulent content. This self-service approach reduces the need for complex external policing infrastructure while maintaining review authenticity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If shoppers avoid using reviews and ratings due to concerns about fraud, then reliability concerns are reduced, but information loss increases and purchasing decision quality deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrust in reviewsVSAvoiduseful review information
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the review system into verified and unverified sections, clearly distinguishing between authenticated reviews from confirmed purchasers and other review types. This segmentation allows shoppers to focus on the verified section where fraudulent reviews are minimized, maintaining trust while preserving access to valuable product information. The segmentation approach prevents information loss by organizing rather than eliminating review content.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses visual indicators such as color-coded badges or labels to distinguish between verified authentic reviews and unverified or potentially fraudulent reviews. Authentic reviews from verified purchasers are marked with distinctive visual markers that increase shopper confidence. This visual differentiation maintains trust in the review system while preserving the informational value of all reviews by making authenticity easily identifiable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #32Color changes

Data Source

PatentUS11734733B2Conversational mapping of web items for mediated group decisions
Publication Date: 2023.08.22 KRUEPL SYPIEN BERNHARD
  • US11734733B2 patent drawing
  • US11734733B2 patent drawing
  • US11734733B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and apparatus for conversational mapping of web items for mediated group decisions is disclosed. In one embodiment of the method, a web server delivers a web page that comprises a hyperlink and identities of one or more products that were selected at an E-commerce website by an online shopper via a web browser. In response to activation of the hyperlink by the online shopper via the web browser, product information for the one or more products is transferred in a transaction message to a decision-support system via a network. The decision-support system sends some or all of the product information to one or more user devices. The decision-support system subsequently receives review information related to the one or more products from the one or more user devices via a messaging service. The decision-support system processes the product review information to generate a result, and the decision-support system sends the result to another user device for display thereon via the messaging service.