Mediator Server for Hybrid Source Control Integration
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Software development companies face challenges in integrating centralized and distributed source control systems, as they often have significant investments in centralized systems and may need to accommodate distributed systems while ensuring seamless revision control and compatibility between the two.
Innovation Solution
A method that allows a distributed source control system to interact with a centralized source control system by creating a replica of the source code repository, known as a 'team hub,' which is updated periodically and enables software developers to request and submit changes in a format compatible with the centralized system, facilitating hybrid use of both models.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Adaptability or versatility
If a centralized source control system is used, then revision control from a central location is achieved, but developers cannot use distributed source control features
Solution Approach 1:
A server computer acts as an intermediary between the centralized source control repository and the distributed source control system. The server receives change sets from the distributed system, converts them into centralized system formats, and submits them to the centralized repository, enabling both systems to work together without direct complexity
Solution Approach 2:
The system creates a copy of the centralized source control repository that is accessible by the distributed source control system. This copy allows developers to work with distributed version control while the changes are eventually synchronized back to the centralized system, providing both models' benefits
2Ease of operation
If a distributed source control system is used, then developers gain peer-to-peer revision control, but integration with centralized source control system becomes difficult
Solution Approach 1:
The server computer serves as a mediator that translates between the peer-to-peer model of distributed source control and the client-server model of centralized source control. It receives change sets from distributed developers, processes them, and submits them to the centralized repository, enabling seamless integration
Solution Approach 2:
The server computer performs multiple functions: it acts as a centralized repository, a translation layer between different source control models, and a synchronization point. This multi-functionality allows both distributed and centralized workflows to coexist and integrate smoothly
3Adaptability or versatility
If companies switch from centralized to distributed source control system, then developer flexibility improves, but investment costs increase
Solution Approach 1:
The system implements distributed source control features partially by allowing developers to use distributed workflows for their local development while maintaining connection to the existing centralized repository. Not all aspects need to change - only the local development model, while the centralized repository remains intact
Solution Approach 2:
The server computer is set up in advance to handle the translation and synchronization between distributed and centralized models. This preliminary infrastructure setup enables gradual adoption of distributed source control without requiring immediate full system replacement, reducing overall change costs
Data Source
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
AI summary
A method is presented for using a distributed source control system with a centralized source control system. A first set of files is obtained from a source control repository and stored on a first electronic computing device. The first set of files comprises all or part of a code base in the centralized source control system. A request is received for at least part of the code base from a second electronic computing device in a distributed source control system. As a result of the request, at least a part of the first set of files is sent to the second electronic computing device. A change set for the first set of files is received from the second electronic computing device. The change set is processed to be in a format compatible with the source control repository. The change set is submitted to the source control repository.