Medical Alert System Segmentation for ICU Monitoring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current alarm systems in healthcare settings, particularly for devices like infusion pumps and ventilators, often fail to effectively notify multiple personnel of potential safety issues due to programming errors or malfunctions, leading to delayed responses and increased risk of patient harm due to excessive false alarms, environmental noise, and the physical layout of ICUs.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that monitors data from medical devices, compares it to pre-established rules, and compiles alert information packets to transmit to multiple healthcare providers and locations, providing specific and timely notifications about potential safety concerns, such as programming errors or device malfunctions, to ensure rapid response and minimize patient harm.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If one person monitors all machines at one time, then monitoring cost is reduced, but it becomes impractical when machines are located in different areas

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemonitoring costVSAvoidmonitoring practicality
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The monitoring system is segmented into distributed monitoring stations located in different areas, each capable of independently monitoring local machines. The central system divides the monitoring task across multiple locations, making it practical to monitor machines in different areas while maintaining cost efficiency through automated electronic notification rather than requiring multiple human monitors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

An electronic notification system acts as an intermediary between machines and human operators. When a machine requires attention, the system automatically sends notifications to relevant personnel, eliminating the need for continuous human monitoring while maintaining practical responsiveness across distributed locations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Device complexity

If generic alarms are used without diagnostic data, then device complexity is reduced, but diagnosis time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealarm system complexityVSAvoiddiagnosis time
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary diagnostic actions by automatically analyzing alarm data and preparing diagnostic information before human operators arrive. The notification includes pre-processed diagnostic data about the nature and location of the problem, so operators receive ready-to-act information rather than raw alarm signals requiring manual diagnosis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides feedback to operators with specific diagnostic information about alarm causes, including data from sensors and system logs. This feedback loop delivers actionable intelligence that reduces diagnosis time while maintaining manageable system complexity through automated data processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If multiple notification methods are provided, then notification reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenotification reliabilityVSAvoidnotification system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The notification system is designed with multi-functionality, capable of sending alerts through multiple channels (electronic messages, visual displays, auditory alarms) using a unified platform. This universal system provides reliable multi-method notification while managing complexity through integrated architecture rather than separate independent systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Reliability

If numerous safety devices are monitored, then safety coverage is improved, but monitoring complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety coverageVSAvoidmonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges monitoring of numerous safety devices into a unified automated platform that consolidates data from multiple sources. By combining monitoring functions into a single integrated system with centralized control and automated notification, the system achieves comprehensive safety coverage while managing complexity through consolidation rather than proliferation of separate monitoring systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS7551078B2Device alert system and method
Publication Date: 2009.06.23 INTERMOUNTAIN INTELLECTUAL ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC
  • US7551078B2 patent drawing
  • US7551078B2 patent drawing
  • US7551078B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for providing a safety alert for a device is disclosed. The invention minimizes or prevents the affects of programming errors and/or provides enhanced alert information to a monitoring healthcare provider, wherein the alert information may relate to a potential safety concern. The method includes monitoring data transmitted from a device and comparing the data to pre-established rules. When the data violates the rules, the system compiles an alert information packet, wherein the alert information packet includes information related to the device and the data. The system then transmits the alert information packet and/or an enhanced alert to multiple computer screens in a particular area.