Medical Benefit Comparison System with Data Normalization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Consumers face difficulties in comparing medical insurance plans from different sources due to varying costs and benefits, which are scattered across different documents and databases, making it hard to select an appropriate plan.

Innovation Solution

A computing system that imports and normalizes plan information from various external sources into a standardized format, allowing for a side-by-side comparison of medical insurance plans through a user interface that dynamically adjusts based on user-selected categories.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If plan information is obtained from multiple external sources with different formats and structures, then the comprehensiveness of plan comparison is improved, but the complexity of data processing and normalization increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomprehensiveness of plan comparisonVSAvoidcomplexity of data processing
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary normalization layer that sits between diverse external data sources and the comparison interface. This normalization layer standardizes different data formats, structures, and terminologies into a common framework, enabling comprehensive plan comparison while shielding users from the underlying data processing complexity. The intermediary translates varied external schemas into a unified internal representation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments the complex data processing task into distinct modular components: data import modules for different sources, normalization modules for standardizing specific data types, and comparison modules for analyzing standardized data. This segmentation allows each component to handle specific aspects independently, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining comprehensive comparison capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Adaptability or versatility

If plan information is scattered across different documents and databases, then the variety of available plans increases, but the ease of accessing and comparing information decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevariety of available plansVSAvoidease of accessing and comparing information
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges information from multiple scattered documents and databases into a single unified comparison interface. By consolidating diverse plan information into one standardized view, the system maintains access to a wide variety of plans while dramatically improving ease of comparison. Users can view and compare all plans in one location rather than navigating multiple separate documents.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The comparison interface is designed as a universal system that can handle multiple data sources, formats, and plan types through a single standardized interface. This multi-functional platform accommodates various external sources while presenting information in a consistent, easy-to-navigate format that simplifies user interaction regardless of the original data source.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Measurement precision

If detailed plan information is provided from multiple sources, then the accuracy of comparison increases, but the time required to process and analyze the information increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of comparisonVSAvoidtime required to process information
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary normalization and standardization of detailed plan information during the data import phase, before the actual comparison takes place. By pre-processing and organizing detailed information into standardized formats in advance, the system maintains high comparison accuracy while reducing the time required during the actual analysis phase, as the data is already prepared and structured.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10628796B2Systems and processes of importing and comparing benefit options
Publication Date: 2020.04.21 ADP INC
  • US10628796B2 patent drawing
  • US10628796B2 patent drawing
  • US10628796B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and processes of comparing medical benefit options obtained from different, external sources are disclosed. The processes include a method of comparing plan benefits implemented in a computing system. The method includes: obtaining plan information associated with different plans from different external sources and which are related to pre-defined categories; normalizing the plan information into a common form for each of the pre-defined categories; and generating a visual display of a plurality of selectable and dynamically changeable areas each of which is associated with a pre-defined category of a different plan and which is populated with the normalized imported plan information in a standard format in a side-by-side manner.