Automated Medical Coding System Using NLP for Billing Accuracy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Manual medical coding for billing is time-consuming, prone to errors, and requires complex interpretation of clinical documentation to assign standardized codes, which affects reimbursement accuracy and efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A system that uses a natural language understanding engine to automatically analyze clinical documentation, extract relevant information, and sequence medical billing codes based on significance, allowing for user feedback to adapt and improve the coding process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual medical coding is used to interpret clinical documentation and assign billing codes, then coding accuracy can be maintained through human judgment, but the process becomes time-consuming and reduces productivity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoding accuracyVSAvoidcoding speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an automated medical coding system as an intermediary between clinical documentation and billing code assignment. The system uses natural language processing to interpret clinical text and automatically generates billing codes, reducing the need for manual coding while maintaining accuracy through algorithmic analysis and validation rules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical process of human coders interpreting clinical documentation with an automated computational system. The system uses natural language processing algorithms and machine learning models to analyze clinical text and assign billing codes, significantly increasing productivity while maintaining coding accuracy through consistent application of coding rules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If automated medical coding systems are implemented to increase productivity, then coding speed improves, but errors may increase due to lack of human judgment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoding speedVSAvoidcoding accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where the automated coding system continuously learns from coded data and user corrections. The system analyzes coding outcomes, compares them against coding guidelines, and adjusts its algorithms to improve accuracy over time, ensuring that increased productivity does not compromise coding reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary analysis of clinical documentation using natural language processing to identify potential billing codes before final assignment. The system pre-processes clinical text to extract relevant information and generates candidate codes that are then validated against coding rules, ensuring accurate code assignment while maintaining high productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If complex interpretation of clinical documentation is performed manually to ensure accurate code assignment, then reimbursement accuracy is maintained, but the complexity of the process increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereimbursement accuracyVSAvoidcoding process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complex coding process into distinct automated components: natural language processing to analyze clinical text, information extraction to identify billing-relevant data, code assignment algorithms to generate billing codes, and validation rules to ensure accuracy. This segmentation automates each step, maintaining reimbursement accuracy while reducing overall process complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameters of the coding process by transitioning from manual human interpretation to automated computational analysis. The system uses natural language processing parameters to analyze clinical text and applies coding rule parameters to assign billing codes, maintaining reimbursement accuracy through precise algorithmic processing while simplifying the overall process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Adaptability or versatility

If manual medical coding processes are used, then flexibility in handling complex cases is maintained, but the time required for each coding task increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehandling flexibilityVSAvoidcoding time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic automated coding system that can adapt to different coding scenarios and complexity levels. The system uses natural language processing to dynamically analyze clinical documentation and adjusts its code assignment strategy based on the specific characteristics of each case, maintaining handling flexibility while significantly reducing coding time through automated processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS10949602B2Sequencing medical codes methods and apparatus
Publication Date: 2021.03.16 MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC
  • US10949602B2 patent drawing
  • US10949602B2 patent drawing
  • US10949602B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Some aspect include a system for automatically processing text comprising information regarding a patient encounter to prioritize medical billing codes derived from the text. The system comprises at least one storage medium storing processor-executable instructions, and at least one processor configured to execute the processor-executable instructions to analyze the text to extract a plurality of facts from the text, assign a plurality of medical billing codes to the text based at least in part on the plurality of facts, using a model trained at least in part on feedback from a user, order the plurality of medical billing codes in a sequence beginning with a primary medical billing code corresponding to a primary diagnosis associated with the text, and present the ordered sequence of medical billing codes to the user for review.