Multilayer Collision Sensor for Medical Apparatus

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional collision sensors for medical apparatuses are not robust or disinfectable and only provide selective, spatially limited force measurement, failing to meet the criteria for medical technology applications.

Innovation Solution

A multilayer, flat collision sensor device with two sensors separated by a spacer layer and a crumple layer, combined with a surface layer, using textile materials and different sensor principles for enhanced disinfectability, robustness, and spatially resolved measurement, allowing for staged triggering and redundancy in collision detection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional collision sensors (load cell or pressure sensor) are used, then force measurement is achieved, but the sensor only provides selective, spatially limited measurement and lacks robustness and disinfectability for medical applications

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespatial resolution of collision detectionVSAvoidrobustness and disinfectability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The sensor is divided into multiple independent sensing zones arranged in a matrix pattern, allowing spatially resolved collision detection across different areas while each zone maintains the same robust and disinfectable construction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The sensor combines multiple materials with different properties: a robust outer layer for disinfectability, a compliant intermediate layer for sensing, and a rigid backing layer for structural support, achieving both measurement capability and medical-grade durability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Reliability

If a robust and disinfectable sensor structure is used, then reliability for medical applications is improved, but the sensor may become less sensitive to collision forces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverobustness and disinfectabilityVSAvoidsensitivity to collision
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

Different layers of the sensor have different local properties: the outer layer is hard and disinfectable, while the intermediate sensing layer is soft and compliant to detect forces, allowing each layer to optimize its function without compromising the other

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The multi-layer composite structure combines materials with contrasting mechanical properties, where the compliant intermediate layer maintains sensitivity to collision forces while being sandwiched between robust outer and backing layers that provide durability and disinfectability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Ease of operation

If a flat sensor structure is used, then ease of integration and coverage area is improved, but the sensor may lack the cushioning effect to prevent damage during collision

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintegration and coverageVSAvoiddamage protection capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The sensor incorporates a crumple layer behind the sensing elements that is designed to deform and absorb energy during collision, providing cushioning protection in advance before damage can occur to the sensor or underlying components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Solution Approach 2:

The sensor transitions from a two-dimensional flat structure to a three-dimensional multi-layer construction, adding depth in the vertical dimension to accommodate the crumple layer while maintaining a thin overall profile for easy integration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Reliability

If multiple sensors are used for staged triggering and redundancy, then collision detection reliability is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision detection reliabilityVSAvoidsensor structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple sensing zones are merged into a single integrated sensor assembly with shared layers (spacer layer, crumple layer, backing layer), reducing overall complexity compared to using separate sensor units while maintaining redundancy and staged triggering capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS9737270B2Collision sensor device for a medical apparatus, and medical apparatus
Publication Date: 2017.08.22 SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS AG
  • US9737270B2 patent drawing
  • US9737270B2 patent drawing
  • US9737270B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A collision sensor device for a medical apparatus includes a sensor structure having a first sensor and a second sensor that are separated by a spacer layer, at least one crumple layer that adjoins one of the first sensor and the second sensor and is configured to provide a run-on path, and an outer surface layer provided on a side facing away from the medical apparatus in an installed state of the collision sensor device.