Medical Procedure Costing System Using Activity-Based RVU Allocation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Medical practices face challenges in accurately articulating their production in standardized units to allocate operating costs effectively due to the complexity of integrating clinical and financial data, with traditional cost accounting methods being inadequate for detailed cost analysis and activity-based costing requiring difficult-to-obtain detailed information.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for calculating Relative Value Units (RVUs) using CMS-published RVU weight tables, incorporating Location of Service and Modifiers, and analyzing medical procedure activity-based costing through a Process Module with input from Financial Data to produce accurate and detailed financial analyses.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional cost accounting methods are used, then cost allocation is simplified, but cost accuracy and detail are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecost accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments costs into direct costs (easily traceable to specific procedures) and indirect costs (requiring allocation), and further segments indirect costs by activity categories. This segmentation allows traditional accounting simplicity to be maintained for direct costs while applying more detailed activity-based allocation only where needed, improving cost accuracy without overwhelming system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different levels of cost allocation detail to different procedures based on their characteristics. Frequently performed procedures receive detailed activity-based cost analysis, while less common procedures use simplified allocation. This local quality approach ensures cost accuracy where it matters most while maintaining overall system manageability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Measurement precision

If activity-based costing is implemented, then cost accuracy improves, but information requirements and implementation difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecost accuracyVSAvoidinformation collection difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal activity classification system that can be applied across all medical procedures. By defining standardized activity categories (e.g., physician work, practice expenses, malpractice insurance) that serve multiple procedures simultaneously, the system reduces information collection requirements compared to developing unique cost models for each procedure, while still achieving accurate activity-based costing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary classification of costs into activity categories before allocating them to procedures. By pre-organizing cost data into standardized activity buckets and establishing allocation rates in advance, the system reduces the complexity of real-time information collection and measurement, making activity-based costing more implementable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If detailed activity information is collected, then cost allocation accuracy improves, but data management burden increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecost allocation accuracyVSAvoiddata management time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameters of cost allocation from procedure-specific detailed tracking to activity-based aggregation. By shifting the allocation parameter from individual procedure characteristics to broader activity categories, the system maintains cost allocation accuracy while significantly reducing data management requirements and time investment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Measurement precision

If standardized production units are implemented, then cost quantification improves, but adaptability to unique services decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction quantification accuracyVSAvoidservice variety coverage
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal RVU-based production measurement system that can quantify diverse medical services through standardized units. Each service is expressed in terms of activity-based RVUs that capture physician work, practice expenses, and malpractice insurance. This universal framework enables accurate production quantification across hundreds of unique services while maintaining the ability to adapt to service variety through the flexible activity classification system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS8484043B2Method and system for medical procedure activity-based costing and margin analysis
Publication Date: 2013.07.09 BROOKHART DUANE
  • US8484043B2 patent drawing
  • US8484043B2 patent drawing
  • US8484043B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention provides a method and system for performing activity-based costing and procedure margin analysis for medical practices. Medical practice costs are allocated across relevant production activity based on procedure-specific, location-specific, modifier-adjusted Relative Value Units. Procedure production volumes, production costs and Payer fees are integrated and analyzed to determine such values as Procedure volumes, Procedure costs, Procedure Margins, Payer Margins and Percent Payer Margins. The results are presented in meaningful reports, tables and graphs, including representations by Practice, Provider, Procedure, and Payer.