Medical Data Scheduling for Doctor Assignment and AI Priority Resolution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing medical data scheduling systems face challenges in optimizing the scheduling of medical data analysis by doctors, considering various parameters such as doctor availability, medical condition specialization, urgency of patient data, and budget constraints, while also addressing issues with subjective priority rankings and conflicting AI system prioritizations.

Innovation Solution

A dynamic scheduling system that incorporates multiple information sources and constraints to optimize the scheduling of medical data analysis. This system includes a scheduler that creates schedules for assigning medical data to available doctors, taking into account various objectives and constraints, and also provides techniques for equalizing scores associated with medical data to ensure fair operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If multiple AI systems are incorporated to improve interpretation times for specific imaging studies, then interpretation efficiency is improved, but priority conflicts arise that hurt global interpretation times

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterpretation efficiencyVSAvoidglobal interpretation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple AI prioritization systems into a single unified scheduling framework that coordinates their outputs. The scheduler integrates priority signals from different AI systems and resolves conflicts by optimizing for global interpretation time rather than allowing individual AI systems to operate independently, thus merging their capabilities while eliminating priority conflicts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The scheduling system dynamically adjusts priorities based on real-time hospital workload, doctor availability, and urgent cases. Rather than using static priority rankings from AI systems, the scheduler continuously optimizes the schedule to minimize global interpretation time, adapting to changing conditions and resolving priority conflicts dynamically.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of manufacture

If subjective priority rankings are used to schedule medical data analysis, then ease of implementation is improved, but scheduling optimization is reduced due to abuse and inability to compare urgency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of implementationVSAvoidscheduling optimization
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an objective scheduling framework that acts as an intermediary between subjective priority requests and actual scheduling decisions. The scheduler translates subjective urgency assessments into an optimized global schedule by considering hospital workload, doctor availability, and multiple objectives, preventing abuse while maintaining ease of use through automated optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Device complexity

If simple scheduling methods like first-in-first-out queue are used, then device complexity is reduced, but scheduling optimization is insufficient for multiple parameters

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescheduling system complexityVSAvoidscheduling optimization
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the scheduling problem from a simple queue-based system to an optimization problem with multiple parameters including doctor availability, medical condition specialization, urgency, and budget constraints. By changing the approach from first-in-first-out to multi-objective optimization, the system achieves superior scheduling performance while managing complexity through automated algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Ease of operation

If scores from different devices are used without equalization, then ease of operation is improved, but scheduler operation is skewed due to non-unitary score computation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidscheduler operation reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies score equalization techniques to bring scores from different AI systems and devices to a common scale or reference frame. This ensures that all priority scores are comparable and weighted appropriately in the optimization process, preventing any single device's scoring methodology from skewing the overall scheduler operation while maintaining ease of use through automated normalization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #12Equipotentiality

Data Source

PatentUS12347552B2Medical data management system, method and computer program
Publication Date: 2025.07.01 SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS AG
  • US12347552B2 patent drawing
  • US12347552B2 patent drawing
  • US12347552B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A scheduling system includes: a plurality of input devices configured to output medical data, a workforce storage, configured to store working characteristics of a plurality of doctors, and a scheduler configured to receive as input data related to the medical data and the working characteristics, and configured to provide as output a plurality of schedules for the plurality of doctors for analysing the medical data.