Medical Document Disease Detection System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

There is a risk of overlooking diseases described in medical documents such as interpretation reports, which can lead to delays in treatment and worsening of symptoms.

Innovation Solution

An information processing apparatus and method that acquires and compares first and second medical documents, displaying information about target diseases in a manner that indicates their presence in both documents, thereby preventing overlooking.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If doctors review medical documents manually, then treatment decisions can be made, but diseases may be overlooked leading to delays in treatment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedisease detection reliabilityVSAvoidtreatment delay
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary extraction and comparison of disease information from medical documents before the doctor makes treatment decisions. By pre-identifying diseases and their descriptions in both interpretation reports and medical records, the system enables timely detection without requiring manual review of entire documents, thus preventing treatment delays while maintaining reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The information processing apparatus acts as an intermediary between medical documents and the doctor's decision-making process. It automatically compares disease information from interpretation reports with medical records, extracting key disease descriptions and presenting them for review, thereby ensuring reliable disease detection while reducing time loss through automated preliminary processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of information

If disease information is extracted from multiple medical documents, then completeness of disease information improves, but complexity of information processing increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedisease information completenessVSAvoidinformation processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the information processing task into distinct modules: extraction of disease information from interpretation reports, extraction of disease information from medical records, comparison of the two datasets, and generation of disease lists. This segmentation reduces overall processing complexity by handling each step independently and systematically, while ensuring complete disease information is captured from multiple documents

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system extracts only the relevant disease information from multiple medical documents, separating it from unnecessary contextual data. By focusing extraction on disease-specific content and presenting it in a consolidated format, the system achieves information completeness while minimizing processing complexity through targeted extraction rather than comprehensive analysis

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS20250025110A1Information processing apparatus, information processing method, and information processing program
Publication Date: 2025.01.23 FUJIFILM CORP
  • US20250025110A1 patent drawing
  • US20250025110A1 patent drawing
  • US20250025110A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An information processing apparatus includes at least one processor. The processor is configured to acquire a first medical document in which information on a disease recognized for a patient is described, and acquire a second medical document in which information on a treatment for the disease of the patient or information on course information on the disease of the patient is described. The processor is configured to display, for each target disease including the disease described in the first medical document and the disease described in the second medical document, first information indicating that description about the target disease is present in the first medical document and second information indicating that description about the target disease is present in the second medical document in an identifiable manner.