Medical Guide Wire Hardness Gradient for Resilient Navigation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing guide wires lack resilience, which affects their operability and ability to restore shape after bending, especially in treating stenosis and chronic total occlusion in blood vessels.

Innovation Solution

A medical wire material made of stainless steel with a specific hardness distribution, where the outer peripheral portion of the transverse section has an average hardness of 8.0 GPa or higher, achieved through a combination of wire drawing and specific straightening processes, including plastic deformation and tension annealing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional guide wire materials (such as SUS304) are used, then manufacturing is straightforward, but resilience is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveresilienceVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by creating a hardness gradient within the wire cross-section. The outer peripheral portion (within d/17 mm from the surface) is hardened to 8.0-12.0 GPa through selective heat treatment, while the central portion maintains lower hardness (3.0-6.0 GPa). This localized property differentiation provides resilience at the surface while maintaining ductility and manufacturability in the core.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes physical parameters by controlling the hardness distribution through specific heat treatment parameters. By adjusting heating temperature (500-750°C), holding time (1-30 minutes), and cooling rates, the outer peripheral hardness is optimized to 8.0-12.0 GPa while the center remains softer. This parameter control resolves the contradiction between resilience and manufacturability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Strength

If wire hardness is increased throughout the cross section, then strength improves, but rotation operability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewire strengthVSAvoidrotation operability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by creating a hardness gradient within the wire cross-section. The outer peripheral portion (within d/17 mm from the surface) is hardened to 8.0-12.0 GPa through selective heat treatment, while the central portion maintains lower hardness (3.0-6.0 GPa). This localized property differentiation provides resilience at the surface while maintaining ductility and manufacturability in the core.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Ease of operation

If the guide wire is made more flexible to navigate complex pathways, then operability improves, but shape restoration capability worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenavigation capabilityVSAvoidshape restoration capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by creating a hardness gradient within the wire cross-section. The outer peripheral portion (within d/17 mm from the surface) is hardened to 8.0-12.0 GPa through selective heat treatment, while the central portion maintains lower hardness (3.0-6.0 GPa). This localized property differentiation provides resilience at the surface while maintaining ductility and manufacturability in the core.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite structure within the homogeneous wire material by inducing a hardness gradient through differential heat treatment. The wire effectively becomes a composite of hard outer layer and soft core, combining the benefits of flexibility (from soft core) and shape restoration (from hard outer layer) without requiring multi-material construction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enhances the guide wire's resilience and rotation operability, allowing it to maintain shape integrity and navigate complex vascular pathways effectively.

Implementation Method 1

a wire diameter of the wire material is reduced by wire drawing

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPlastic deformation: Plasticity

Implementation Method 2

an average value of hardness of an outer peripheral portion of a transverse section of the wire material, as measured by a Nanoindentation method, is equal to or greater than 8.0 GPa

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectWork hardening:

Implementation Method 3

including plastic deformation and tension annealing

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAnnealing: Annealing

Data Source

PatentUS20250229009A1Medical wire material and guide wire
Publication Date: 2025.07.17 ASAHI INTECC CO LTD
  • US20250229009A1 patent drawing
  • US20250229009A1 patent drawing
  • US20250229009A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A medical wire material including stainless steel. A shape of a transverse section of the wire material is a circle having a diameter of d mm, and an average value of hardness of an outer peripheral portion of the transverse section of the wire material, as measured by a Nanoindentation method, is equal to or greater than 8.0 GPa. The outer peripheral portion is a region that extends radially inward from an outer peripheral edge of the transverse section by a distance of d/17 mm.