Medical Image Analysis System for Highlighting Lesion Differences

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional CAD systems for medical image analysis often overwhelm physicians with numerous lesion candidates, leading to potential overlooking of important findings, as the analysis results are displayed after diagnosis completion, making it burdensome to efficiently identify critical information.

Innovation Solution

A system that compares first and second medical image analysis results from computer processing, highlighting differences in lesion candidates detected, such as new or changed lesions, through distinct output methods like pop-up windows, email notifications, or altered display cursors, to draw attention to significant changes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If all lesion candidates detected by CAD are presented to the physician, then the completeness of diagnosis is improved, but the burden on the physician increases and lesion candidates may be overlooked

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompleteness of diagnosisVSAvoidburden on physician
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the newly detected lesion candidates from the CAD analysis results and presents them separately from previously detected lesions. This allows the physician to focus on new findings without being overwhelmed by all lesion candidates, maintaining diagnostic completeness while reducing burden.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the CAD analysis results into two distinct groups: newly detected lesion candidates and previously detected lesions. By separating these categories and presenting them differently, the system helps the physician efficiently identify critical new findings while maintaining awareness of all lesions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Ease of operation

If lesion candidates are filtered by confidence or importance, then the number of presented candidates is reduced, but important lesions may be missed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of presented candidatesVSAvoidimportance of detected lesions
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary comparison between current and past CAD analysis results to identify newly detected lesion candidates before presenting them to the physician. This preliminary action ensures that all potentially important lesions are identified and presented, avoiding the risk of missing critical findings while still reducing the number of candidates displayed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If analysis results are displayed after diagnosis completion, then fair diagnosis without CAD influence is achieved, but efficient identification of critical information becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefairness of diagnosisVSAvoidtime to identify critical information
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts newly detected lesion candidates from the complete CAD analysis results and presents them in a prominent, separate manner after diagnosis completion. This allows the physician to maintain independent diagnosis without CAD influence while efficiently identifying critical new findings through the extracted and highlighted presentation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS20230316526A1Storage medium, information processing apparatus, information processing method, and information processing system
Publication Date: 2023.10.05 KONICA MINOLTA INC
  • US20230316526A1 patent drawing
  • US20230316526A1 patent drawing
  • US20230316526A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium stores a program to cause a computer to perform: acquiring a first analysis result obtained by a computer process on a first medical image of a patient; acquiring a second analysis result obtained by a computer process on a second medical image of the patient; and comparing the first analysis result and the second analysis result and in a situation in which there is a difference, outputting in a manner different from the situation in which there is no difference.