Medical Image Processing Model for Denoising and Artifact Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional machine learning techniques for image quality optimization in medical imaging fail to achieve satisfactory results in denoising, artifact reduction, motion correction, and resolution enhancement.

Innovation Solution

A system and method utilizing an image processing model that includes an acquisition module to acquire images, a determination module to determine related features, and an optimization module to enhance image quality based on machine learning algorithms, tailored to specific imaging devices and subjects.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If traditional machine learning techniques are used for image quality optimization, then the processing can be performed, but the optimization results are unsatisfactory in denoising, artifact reduction, motion correction, and resolution enhancement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage quality optimization resultsVSAvoideffectiveness of medical image processing
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the image quality optimization problem into a parameter prediction task. Instead of directly optimizing image quality, the model predicts parameters (noise levels, artifact characteristics, motion parameters, resolution metrics) that characterize image quality degradation. This parameter-based approach enables more precise and controllable optimization results compared to traditional direct optimization methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces parameter prediction as an intermediary step between image input and quality optimization. The machine learning model first predicts quality parameters from the input image, then uses these predicted parameters to guide the optimization process. This intermediary parameter representation acts as a bridge that enables more effective and interpretable image quality optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Manufacturing precision

If image quality optimization is performed to improve denoising and artifact reduction, then image quality improves, but processing time and computational complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage qualityVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the image quality optimization process into distinct parameter prediction tasks. Instead of attempting to optimize all image quality aspects simultaneously, the model separately predicts different parameters (noise, artifacts, motion, resolution) that can then be addressed individually. This segmentation enables more efficient processing by breaking down the complex optimization problem into manageable components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs parameter prediction as a preliminary action before actual image optimization. By first predicting the quality parameters that characterize the input image, the system can then apply targeted optimization procedures based on these pre-analyzed parameters. This preliminary parameter assessment enables more efficient optimization by avoiding trial-and-error approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentEP4141782B1Image quality optimization method, and system
Publication Date: 2025.12.03 SHANGHAI UNITED IMAGING HEALTHCARE
  • EP4141782B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4141782B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4141782B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The present disclosure discloses methods and systems for image quality optimization. The method may include obtaining an image to be processed. The method may also include determining at least one related feature of the image. The at least one related feature may include at least one of an acquisition parameter feature relating to the image, an imaging parameter feature relating to the image, an imaging subject feature of an imaging subject, or a quality feature of the image. The method may also include inputting the image and the at least one related feature into an image processing model. The method may also include determining an optimized image of the image based on an output of the image processing model.