Medical Image Evaluation System for Tissue Sufficiency Assessment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for evaluating medical image quality are subjective and lack comprehensive assessment of tissue sufficiency, obstruction, and technical image quality, which hinders accurate interpretation and prognosis.

Innovation Solution

A medical image evaluation method and system that perform image segmentation to delineate tissues of interest, resolve missing tissue, and assess the suitability of images for interpretation, using quantitative and objective criteria.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If subjective visual evaluation is used to assess image quality, then the evaluation process is simple and quick, but the accuracy and objectivity of tissue sufficiency assessment deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation speedVSAvoidtissue sufficiency assessment accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical/visual evaluation system with an automated computational system that uses image processing algorithms, machine learning models, and quantitative metrics to objectively assess tissue sufficiency, obstruction, and technical image quality, thereby improving measurement precision while maintaining evaluation efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary automated evaluation system that acts as a bridge between the acquired medical image and the final interpretation, providing objective quantitative assessments of tissue sufficiency, obstruction levels, and technical quality metrics that enhance the reliability of clinical decision-making

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If comprehensive assessment of tissue sufficiency, obstruction, and technical image quality is performed, then the accuracy of image interpretation improves, but the complexity of the evaluation system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage interpretation reliabilityVSAvoidevaluation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the comprehensive image quality assessment into three distinct modular components: tissue sufficiency evaluation, obstruction detection and quantification, and technical image quality assessment. Each component can be independently developed, validated, and optimized, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining comprehensive evaluation capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent designs a universal automated evaluation system that performs multiple functions including tissue sufficiency assessment, obstruction detection, technical quality metrics calculation, and interpretation suitability determination, thereby achieving comprehensive assessment through a single integrated platform rather than multiple separate systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Illumination intensity

If image processing is applied to enhance visual assessment, then image quality perception improves, but image artefacts and noise may be introduced that alter feature perception

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage quality perceptionVSAvoidprocessing-induced artefacts
Core Design Contradiction:
Illumination intensityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary assessment of tissue sufficiency, obstruction, and technical quality metrics before any interpretive analysis is conducted. This preliminary evaluation identifies potential issues with processing-induced artefacts and noise, allowing the system to flag images that may require alternative processing approaches or repeat acquisition

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where the automated evaluation system continuously monitors image quality metrics throughout the processing pipeline, adjusting processing parameters in real-time to minimize the introduction of artefacts and noise while maintaining enhanced visual assessment quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250037281A1System and method for evaluation of image quality
Publication Date: 2025.01.30 VOLPARA HEALTH TECH
  • US20250037281A1 patent drawing
  • US20250037281A1 patent drawing
  • US20250037281A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method are disclosed for quantitative evaluation of image acquisition quality within a field of view and derivation of associated qualitative metrics to inform interpretation. The medical image evaluation system comprises: a data input device to acquire data of medical images: and a data processor to perform an image segmentation on one or more of the medical image(s) of a body portion to delineate tissue(s) of interest from a surrounding region within a field of view. The data processor is configured to resolve any missing tissue which is any portion of the tissue(s) of interest missing from the image segmentation. The data processor is configured to quantify suitability of the medical images for interpretation by making an estimate of amount or location of the missing tissue. A data device is configured to advise a user of the quantified suitability of the medical images for interpretation.