Medical Image Quality Scoring for Reliable Disease Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing medical diagnostics devices struggle with inaccurate image quality assessment, leading to false positives and negatives in disease detection due to poor image quality, which can be caused by artifacts, different body parts, or out-of-distribution images, affecting the performance and reliability of machine learning models.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a symbiotic relationship between image quality assessment (IQA) and disease detection (DD) models using a decision maker to ensure optimal system performance by discarding low-quality images and retaining high-quality images for accurate disease diagnosis.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If image quality assessment is performed using traditional methods, then the assessment process is simple, but the accuracy of disease detection is reduced due to false positives and negatives

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedisease detection accuracyVSAvoidassessment system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the image assessment task into two specialized components: an Image Quality Assessment (IQA) model that evaluates image quality metrics, and a Disease Detection (DD) model that identifies pathological features. This segmentation allows each model to specialize in its specific function, improving overall detection accuracy while managing complexity through modular architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A decision maker component is introduced as an intermediary that receives inputs from both the IQA model and DD model, processes their outputs, and makes the final determination. This intermediary coordinates between the two specialized models, enabling them to work together synergistically to resolve the contradiction between assessment simplicity and detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If low-quality images are included in diagnosis, then the imaging procedure time is reduced, but the reliability of disease detection deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimaging procedure efficiencyVSAvoiddisease detection reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary image quality assessment using the IQA model before the disease detection process. This preliminary action identifies and flags low-quality images that would compromise diagnostic reliability, allowing the system to request retakes before proceeding with disease detection, thus preventing unreliable results while maintaining efficient workflow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The decision maker implements a feedback mechanism that monitors the quality scores from the IQA model and adjusts the imaging workflow accordingly. When low-quality images are detected, the system provides feedback to request retakes, and when high-quality images are confirmed, it proceeds with disease detection, creating a self-regulating system that balances efficiency and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If multiple machine learning models are used for image assessment and disease detection, then the diagnostic accuracy is improved, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnostic accuracyVSAvoidmodel integration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the diagnostic task into two distinct machine learning models: an Image Quality Assessment (IQA) model with specialized neural network architecture for quality evaluation, and a Disease Detection (DD) model with architecture optimized for pathological feature recognition. This segmentation allows each model to be trained and optimized independently for its specific function, improving diagnostic accuracy while managing complexity through specialized modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A decision maker component serves as an intermediary that integrates the outputs from multiple specialized machine learning models. It receives quality assessments from the IQA model and disease predictions from the DD model, processes their combined information, and generates the final diagnostic result. This intermediary manages the complexity of model integration by providing a unified decision-making layer that coordinates between specialized components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS12586180B2Assessment of image quality for a medical diagnostics device
Publication Date: 2026.03.24 AI OPTICS
  • US12586180B2 patent drawing
  • US12586180B2 patent drawing
  • US12586180B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A medical diagnostic system can assess quality of a representation of a body part determined based on a response of the body part to exposure to electromagnetic waves, process the representation with a disease detection machine learning model to determine a certainty measure for a presence of a disease, determine a quality score for the representation based on the quality of the representation and the certainty measure, and discard the at least one representation based on the quality score. Combining machine learning in conjunction with one another, such as, for quality assessment and disease detection, can provide for more accurate image quality analysis, lead to faster medical imaging, and reduce the need to retake images or entirely re-perform medical imaging. The system can be easier to use, be more robust and faster than other systems by reducing the need to retake images while maintaining performance of the system.