Medical Image Registration Using Variance-Based Regularization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing medical image processing techniques face challenges in accurately registering novel medical image datasets with reference datasets due to variations in patient physiology, leading to labor-intensive manual segmentation and subjective results, as well as increased computational intensity with multi-atlas approaches.

Innovation Solution

A computer system and method that determine a registration mapping between a novel medical image and a reference image, using variance data from a plurality of training images to apply regularization constraints, such as elastic and viscous fluid constraints, to restrict distortion and optimize registration, allowing for more accurate and efficient segmentation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual segmentation is performed by experts, then segmentation reliability is improved, but labor intensity and time consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesegmentation reliabilityVSAvoidprocessing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-segmenting a reference image dataset before registration. The reference dataset is segmented in advance using expert manual segmentation, and this pre-computed segmentation is then transferred to the novel dataset through registration. This eliminates the need for real-time expert segmentation during the registration process, maintaining reliability while improving productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses copying by transferring segmentation information from the reference dataset to the novel dataset through spatial mapping. The segmentation labels and anatomical region definitions from the reference image are copied and applied to the novel image via the computed registration transformation, avoiding repeated manual segmentation while preserving expert-level accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Productivity

If automated segmentation is performed using registration with a reference atlas, then productivity is improved, but manufacturing precision deteriorates due to physiological variations between patients

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesegmentation automationVSAvoidregistration accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by allowing different degrees of freedom in the registration transformation for different spatial locations. The transformation model permits greater local deformation in regions where physiological variation is expected (such as abdominal organs) while maintaining stricter constraints in regions requiring higher precision. This location-dependent flexibility improves registration accuracy without sacrificing automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Manufacturing precision

If multi-atlas approaches are used to handle physiological variations, then registration accuracy is improved, but computational intensity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveregistration accuracyVSAvoidcomputational intensity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by modifying the transformation model parameters to include location-dependent degrees of freedom. Instead of using multiple atlases with identical rigid transformation models, the system uses a single reference atlas with an enhanced transformation model that allows selective flexibility at different spatial locations. This reduces computational intensity while maintaining the ability to handle physiological variations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Device complexity

If rigid transformation models are used for registration, then device complexity is reduced, but adaptability deteriorates due to inability to accommodate anatomical variations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransformation model complexityVSAvoidanatomical variation accommodation
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by transitioning from a static rigid transformation model to a dynamic transformation model with location-dependent degrees of freedom. The transformation adapts its flexibility based on the spatial location being registered, allowing the model to accommodate anatomical variations in different body regions while maintaining computational tractability. This dynamic approach balances complexity and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS9965857B2Medical image processing
Publication Date: 2018.05.08 TOSHIBA MEDICAL SYST CORP
  • US9965857B2 patent drawing
  • US9965857B2 patent drawing
  • US9965857B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Certain embodiments provide a computer system for determining a registration mapping between a novel medical image and a reference medical image, the computer system comprising: a storage system adapted to store data representing the novel medical image and the reference medical image and variance data for a plurality of different locations in the reference medical image representing a statistical variation for corresponding locations identified in a plurality of training medical images; and a processor unit operable to execute machine readable instructions to determine a registration mapping between the novel medical image and the reference medical image in a manner that takes account of the variance data for the plurality of different locations in the reference medical image.