Selection Support System for Medical Image Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Users face difficulty in selecting appropriate applications for medical image processing due to the vast number of available options, leading to potential misdiagnosis, as they struggle to recognize correspondences between applications and processing results.

Innovation Solution

A selection support system that obtains biological information, accumulates user input operation data, and generates recommendation information to identify suitable applications for analyzing new medical images, including identification and characteristic information, to facilitate easier selection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a market place presents a list of applications for medical image processing, then the variety of available applications increases, but the difficulty of selecting an appropriate application increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevariety of applicationsVSAvoiddifficulty of selection
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system collects feedback information about user operations on medical images (such as which applications were used, what operations were performed, and the outcomes) and uses this feedback to generate personalized application recommendations. This feedback loop enables the system to adapt to individual user needs and preferences, making the selection process easier while maintaining access to a wide variety of applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary analysis of user behavior patterns and operational history before the user needs to make a selection. By pre-processing and storing information about user preferences and operational patterns, the system can quickly generate relevant application recommendations when needed, reducing the cognitive load on users during the selection process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If users accumulate experience with multiple applications, then the processing capability increases, but the difficulty of recognizing correspondences between applications and processing results increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing capabilityVSAvoidrecognition of correspondences
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system acts as an intermediary between the user and the vast array of applications by introducing a recommendation layer. This intermediary analyzes user behavior patterns and operational history to bridge the gap between user needs and appropriate applications, making the correspondences explicit rather than requiring users to remember all application functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments the overwhelming set of all available applications into personalized recommendation sets based on user profiles, operational patterns, and specific task requirements. This segmentation divides the large information space into manageable, context-relevant subsets, making it easier for users to recognize and select appropriate applications without being overwhelmed by the total variety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Loss of information

If the system presents all available applications to users, then the completeness of information increases, but the time required for selection increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompleteness of informationVSAvoidtime for selection
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial action by presenting only a curated subset of applications that are most relevant to the user's specific needs and historical patterns, rather than displaying all available applications. This selective presentation maintains sufficient information completeness for effective decision-making while dramatically reducing the time required for selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12082949B2Selection support system and storage medium
Publication Date: 2024.09.10 KONICA MINOLTA INC
  • US12082949B2 patent drawing
  • US12082949B2 patent drawing
  • US12082949B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A selection support system includes one or more hardware processors. A hardware processor among the one or more hardware processors obtains biological information of a subject. The hardware processor layers and accumulates, in an accumulator, input operation information about an input operation performed on the obtained biological information by a user. In response to obtaining new biological information, according to the input operation information accumulated in the accumulator, the hardware processor generates recommendation information that includes identification information identifying an application for analyzing the new biological information and additional information indicating a characteristic of the application.