Automated Text Generation for Medical Image Interpretation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Interpreting and summarizing medical images in a textual format is a time-consuming and labor-intensive task for radiologists, leading to bottlenecks in clinical diagnosis pipelines, especially for novice radiologists unfamiliar with older imaging techniques and experienced radiologists untrained in new techniques.

Innovation Solution

An automated system that uses classifiers to determine the imaging modality and anatomy in medical images, selecting appropriate text generation models to generate a textual description, which is then reported to clinicians via a user interface.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If radiologists manually interpret and summarize medical images, then accurate diagnosis can be achieved, but the process is time-consuming and creates bottlenecks in clinical workflows

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnosis accuracyVSAvoidtime for image interpretation
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an automated image analysis system as an intermediary between the medical image and the radiologist. This system includes multiple modules: an imaging modality classifier that identifies the type of scan (CT, MRI, X-ray), an anatomy classifier that locates body parts, and a text generation module that creates preliminary reports. This intermediary performs the time-consuming manual tasks while radiologists review and validate results, maintaining accuracy while reducing time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If novice radiologists interpret medical images, then patient care can be provided, but their lack of experience with older imaging techniques reduces interpretation effectiveness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to handle different imaging modalitiesVSAvoidinterpretation effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The automated analysis system performs self-service by automatically identifying imaging modalities and anatomical structures without requiring radiologist expertise in distinguishing between different scan types. The imaging modality classifier independently determines whether an image is CT, MRI, or X-ray, and the anatomy classifier independently identifies body parts, freeing radiologists from needing extensive experience with various imaging techniques while maintaining reliable interpretation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If experienced radiologists interpret medical images, then their expertise can be utilized, but they may lack training in new imaging techniques reducing their effectiveness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining in new imaging techniquesVSAvoidclinical diagnosis throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by pre-processing and analyzing medical images before radiologists review them. The automated system classifies imaging modalities, identifies anatomical structures, and generates preliminary text reports in advance. This allows experienced radiologists to focus their expertise on complex case evaluation rather than routine image analysis, maintaining high productivity while accommodating their existing training without requiring continuous retraining on new techniques.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Device complexity

If a single text generation model is used for all imaging modalities, then system complexity is reduced, but accuracy decreases for modality-specific image characteristics

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of text generation modelsVSAvoidtextual description accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by selecting different text generation models based on the specific imaging modality being analyzed. After the imaging modality classifier identifies the scan type (CT, MRI, X-ray, ultrasound), the system routes the image to the appropriate specialized text generation model trained on that specific modality's characteristics. This ensures each modality receives targeted analysis with optimal accuracy while the orchestrator module manages the complexity of having multiple models, preventing the system from becoming unmanageably complex.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS11056227B2System and method for generating textual descriptions from medical images
Publication Date: 2021.07.06 KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS NV
  • US11056227B2 patent drawing
  • US11056227B2 patent drawing
  • US11056227B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for generating a textual description from a medical image, comprising: receiving a medical image having a first modality to a system configured to generate a textual description of the medical image; determining, using an imaging modality classification module, that the first modality is a specific one of a plurality of different modalities; determining, using an anatomy classification module, that the medical image comprises information about a specific portion of an anatomy; identifying, by an orchestrator module based at least on the determined first modality, which of a plurality of different text generation models to utilize to generate a textual description from the medical image; generating, by a text generation module utilizing the identified text generation model, a textual description from the medical image; and reporting, via a user interface of the system, the generated textual description.