Text Summary Generation for Medical Image Data Sets

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems lack efficient methods for automatically generating tailored natural language text summaries that optimally complement medical image data sets and support diagnostic tasks.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method that receives a medical image data set, identifies compartments, accesses patient information, and applies a text generation function to generate natural language text summaries for specific compartments, thereby providing actionable results.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If radiologists manually review all available patient information and previous reports, then the completeness of information is improved, but the time required for diagnosis increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation completenessVSAvoiddiagnosis time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the most relevant information from the vast amount of available patient data, previous reports, and medical records. By automatically filtering and selecting key findings related to the current imaging study, the system provides radiologists with condensed summaries that maintain information completeness while dramatically reducing review time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary analysis and organization of patient information before the radiologist begins their review. It pre-processes medical records, lab results, and previous imaging reports to identify and highlight only the clinically relevant data, so that when the radiologist accesses the information, it is already prepared and prioritized.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Loss of time

If automated systems retrieve and present patient information, then the time required is reduced, but the radiologist's understanding of information relevance decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation retrieval timeVSAvoidinformation interpretability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms that allow radiologists to interact with the generated summaries, provide corrections, and indicate what information they find most useful. This feedback is used to continuously improve the relevance and accuracy of information presentation, ensuring that automated retrieval maintains high interpretability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system acts as an intelligent intermediary between the vast database of patient information and the radiologist. Rather than simply presenting raw data or making final diagnostic decisions, it mediates by organizing, summarizing, and contextualizing information in ways that preserve clinical judgment while reducing the cognitive load on radiologists.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Extent of automation

If AI modules and large language models are used to generate information summaries, then automation is improved, but the transparency and trustworthiness of the information decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation processing automationVSAvoidinformation transparency
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides feedback loops that allow radiologists to query the AI about its reasoning, request explanations for specific recommendations, and verify the sources of generated information. This transparency feedback mechanism maintains trust while preserving high automation levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system serves as a transparent intermediary that clearly distinguishes between AI-generated content and radiologist expertise. It provides traceable connections between source data and generated summaries, allowing radiologists to follow the reasoning process while maintaining full control over final diagnostic decisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Reliability

If comprehensive patient data is analyzed, then the quality of radiological examination is improved, but the complexity of the system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexamination qualityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the complex task of comprehensive patient data analysis into manageable modules: data collection from multiple sources, preliminary processing and validation, relevance filtering, summary generation, and presentation. This segmentation maintains high examination quality by thoroughly analyzing all data while reducing system complexity through organized, modular processing steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20250069727A1Methods and systems for providing a text summary for a medical image data set
Publication Date: 2025.02.27 SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS AG
  • US20250069727A1 patent drawing
  • US20250069727A1 patent drawing
  • US20250069727A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for providing a text summary for a medical image data set comprises: receiving the medical image data set of a patient; identifying at least one compartment in the medical image data set; accessing supplementary information associated with the patient in a medical information system; providing a text generation function configured to provide, for a specific compartment, a natural language text summary summarizing medical information pertaining to the specific compartment; applying the text generation function to the supplementary information to generate a text summary for the at least one compartment; and providing the text summary to a user via a user interface.