Medical Imaging Consistency Check via Error Probability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Medical imaging systems face errors due to inconsistencies in scan parameters and metadata, leading to substandard imaging and incorrect interpretations, often requiring re-examination.

Innovation Solution

A medical imaging system that compares scan parameter data, configuration data, and metadata using a predefined model to estimate error probabilities, notifying users and allowing for corrections before or during image acquisition to ensure consistency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If automated analysis is performed using scan parameters and metadata, then analysis efficiency is improved, but errors in scan parameters or metadata can lead to incorrect analysis results

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanalysis efficiencyVSAvoidanalysis accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary consistency checking of scan parameters and metadata before the automated analysis is executed. By validating the input data in advance and detecting potential errors or inconsistencies prior to analysis, the system ensures that only reliable data is processed, thereby maintaining high analysis accuracy while preserving automated analysis efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If manual checking of scan parameters and metadata is performed, then error detection is improved, but time consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror detectionVSAvoidtime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-checking of scan parameters and metadata through automated consistency validation. The system independently verifies the correctness and consistency of its own input data without requiring manual intervention, thereby achieving reliable error detection while minimizing time consumption associated with manual checking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements automated feedback mechanisms that continuously monitor and validate scan parameters and metadata. By providing real-time feedback on data consistency and quality, the system enables automatic correction or rejection of erroneous data, achieving reliable error detection without the time overhead of manual verification processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Manufacturing precision

If consistency checking is performed before image acquisition, then image quality is improved, but acquisition time is delayed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage qualityVSAvoidacquisition time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs consistency checking of scan parameters and metadata as a preliminary action before image acquisition begins. By validating all input data in advance and obtaining corrections or confirmations prior to the actual scanning process, the system ensures high image quality while minimizing delays to the acquisition timeline.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentEP3676851B1Automated consistency check for medical imaging
Publication Date: 2023.02.22 KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS NV
  • EP3676851B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3676851B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3676851B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

The invention provides for a medical imaging system (100) for acquiring medical image data (144) from an imaging zone (108). The medical imaging system comprises a memory (134) for storing machine executable instructions (140) and medical imaging system commands (142). The medical imaging system commands are configured for controlling the medical imaging system to acquire the medical image data according to a medical imaging protocol. The medical imaging system further comprises a user interface (132). The medical imaging system further comprises a processor (130) for controlling the medical imaging system. Execution of the machine executable instructions cause the processor to: receive (500) scan parameter data (146) for modifying the behavior of the medical imaging system commands; receive (502) metadata (148) descriptive of imaging conditions from the user interface; store (504) configuration data (150, 250, 252, 254) descriptive of a current configuration of the medical imaging system in the memory; calculate (506) an error probability (152) by comparing the metadata, the configuration data, and the scan parameter data using a predefined model (154), wherein the error probability is descriptive of a deviation between the metadata and between the configuration data and/or the scan parameter data; perform (508) a predefined action (158) if the error probability is above a predetermined threshold (156), wherein the predetermined action comprises providing a signal (302) to notify the user; control (510) the medical imaging system to acquire the medical image data from a subject (118); receive (512) a response (160) to the signal from the user interface in response to the signal; and reconstruct (514) one or more medical images (162) from the medical image data in accordance with the response.