Medical Messaging System Routing and Monitoring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Communications breakdowns between healthcare providers lead to significant medical errors, with messages often going undelivered or ignored due to incorrect routing and lack of contextual information, resulting in fatal and nonfatal errors.

Innovation Solution

A web-based system that exchanges patient-related messages between healthcare providers, prioritizes messages based on content, routes them to optimal recipients using algorithms, monitors read status, and alerts providers of unaddressed high-priority messages to prevent communication breakdowns.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If messages are sent to intended recipients using traditional routing, then message delivery is attempted, but messages are often delivered to wrong clinicians or go unanswered due to lack of contextual information

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemessage delivery accuracyVSAvoidcontextual information
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary system that sits between the sender and recipient of messages. This intermediary analyzes message content, determines contextual information about the patient and situation, identifies the optimal recipient based on this context, and routes the message accordingly. This mediator resolves the contradiction by using additional contextual processing to improve delivery accuracy without losing information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary analysis of message content and patient context before routing the message. By examining the message content, patient information, and provider availability in advance, the system determines the optimal recipient beforehand, ensuring the message reaches the right person on the first attempt rather than requiring multiple failed delivery attempts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If healthcare providers are paged frequently to deliver messages, then message delivery coverage is improved, but clinician workflow is interrupted ten to twenty times per hour

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemessage delivery coverageVSAvoidclinician workflow
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts message routing based on real-time provider availability and workflow state. Rather than uniformly paging all providers, the system adapts routing decisions based on current context, such as which providers are currently with patients, which are available, and which have relevant expertise. This dynamic approach maintains delivery coverage while reducing unnecessary interruptions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops where message delivery outcomes, provider responses, and workflow patterns are monitored and used to improve future routing decisions. This feedback mechanism allows the system to learn from past interactions and optimize routing to minimize disruptions while maintaining effective message delivery, addressing both productivity and ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If messages are forwarded to different healthcare providers based on contextual information, then message delivery accuracy is improved, but additional time is required for forwarding and analysis

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemessage routing accuracyVSAvoidmessage processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs automated self-service routing by analyzing message content and patient context using pre-configured algorithms and knowledge bases. Rather than requiring manual review and forwarding by staff, the system autonomously determines optimal routing decisions, eliminating the time cost of manual intervention while maintaining high routing accuracy through systematic analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary analysis and routing determination automatically as part of the message submission process. By pre-configuring routing algorithms and maintaining ready-access patient information, the system determines optimal routing before the message enters the delivery queue, avoiding post-submission processing delays and reducing overall message processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Reliability

If monitoring systems track message read status and send alerts, then communication breakdowns are reduced, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication effectivenessVSAvoidmonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system integrates multiple functions into a unified messaging platform: message composition, contextual analysis, optimal routing, delivery tracking, and alert generation all occur within a single system. This multi-functionality reduces overall system complexity compared to having separate systems for each function, as the messaging system itself performs monitoring and alerting as integrated capabilities rather than requiring additional independent systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS8825786B1System for exchanging medical information
Publication Date: 2014.09.02 MEDARCHON INC
  • US8825786B1 patent drawing
  • US8825786B1 patent drawing
  • US8825786B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A server-based system enables exchange of medical messages between users, monitors for a probability of communications breakdown likely to result in medical error, and instigates corrective actions to prevent communications breakdown from occurring. Monitoring may include whether a user has read or acted upon a message received within a specified timeframe and whether a user has specified routing preferences for delivering a message to a user better suited to read or act on the message. Corrective actions include the determination of and routing of messages to an optimal recipient and the generation of alerts to subsequent users where a message has not been read or acted upon within a specified timeframe.