Medical Record Annotation and Retrieval System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems for managing evidence-based medical information, particularly patient records and treatments, face challenges in efficiently annotating and retrieving relevant protocols and records, especially in cases of institutional readmissions and communication delays, which can impact caregiver decisions and patient care.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that annotate electronic records of medical protocols with document scans, retrieve records based on patient indications and institutional readmissions, and request effectiveness indications from validating entities, while updating prominence indications and cautioning caregivers based on protocol associations and thresholds.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If electronic records are annotated with document scans and retrieved based on multiple criteria, then information accuracy and completeness are improved, but system complexity and retrieval time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the medical information management process into distinct modules: annotation processing, retrieval operations, validation mechanisms, and update functions. Each module handles specific tasks independently, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining information accuracy through specialized processing at each stage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces intermediary components such as validation entities and processing layers that mediate between document scans and electronic records. These intermediaries verify and standardize information before integration, improving accuracy without requiring direct complex interactions between all system components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If multiple validation and communication steps are implemented, then information reliability is improved, but communication delays increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation reliabilityVSAvoidcommunication delays
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary validation and processing of document scans before they are fully integrated into electronic records. By pre-processing and pre-validating information, the system ensures reliability is established early, reducing the need for repeated validation cycles that would cause delays.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where validation results and processing status are continuously monitored and communicated. This allows for real-time adjustments and prioritization of critical information paths, maintaining reliability while minimizing unnecessary delays through adaptive processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If automated annotation and retrieval processes are used, then productivity is improved, but risk of errors in caregiver decisions increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveefficiencyVSAvoiderror risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates self-service validation mechanisms where the automated processes include built-in verification and error-checking capabilities. The system validates its own processing results and flags potential errors automatically, maintaining high productivity while reducing error risks through self-correcting mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies preliminary anti-action by implementing preventive validation and error-checking steps before automated annotation and retrieval operations are finalized. Potential errors are identified and corrected in advance, preventing harmful outcomes while maintaining the efficiency benefits of automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Data Source

PatentUS10340034B2Evidence-based healthcare information management protocols
Publication Date: 2019.07.02 THE INVENTION SCI FUND II LLC
  • US10340034B2 patent drawing
  • US10340034B2 patent drawing
  • US10340034B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Structures and protocols are presented for signaling a status or decision (processing or transmitting a medical record or other resource, e.g.) conditionally. Such signaling may be partly based on one or more symptoms, regimen attributes, performance indicia (compliance indications, e.g.), privacy considerations (patient consent, e.g.), contextual considerations (being in or admitted by a care facility, e.g.), sensor data, or other such determinants. In some contexts this may trigger an incentive being manifested (as a dispensation of an item, e.g.), an intercommunication (telephone call, e.g.) beginning, a device being configured (enabled or customized, e.g.), data distillations being presented or tracked, or other such results.