Medical Report Orchestration via Iterative Algorithm Selection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current medical reporting workflows are inefficient and resource-intensive, with radiologists facing challenges in managing diverse data sources and software tools, leading to incomplete and unclear reports, and excessive memory usage, which hampers accuracy, completeness, and speed in diagnosis.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that integrate medical image data with additional patient information to automatically select and execute report modules and image-analysis algorithms, iteratively refining the report through a feedback loop, using medical ontologies for data standardization and machine-readability, thereby optimizing the reporting process and reducing unnecessary data complexity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If radiologists manually select and use multiple software tools for image analysis, then diagnostic accuracy can be improved, but system complexity and memory usage increase excessively

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnostic accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the complex reporting workflow into modular report templates, each representing a specific diagnostic task or organ system. These modules can be independently selected and executed, reducing the cognitive burden on radiologists while maintaining comprehensive diagnostic coverage through structured composition of multiple specialized modules

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary orchestration layer that automatically manages the selection, configuration, and execution of multiple image analysis algorithms based on the clinical question and image characteristics. This intermediary handles the complexity of tool selection and parameter optimization, allowing radiologists to benefit from multiple algorithms without directly managing their complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If radiologists manually manage multiple data sources and reporting tasks in parallel, then comprehensive diagnosis can be achieved, but reporting efficiency and speed decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompleteness of diagnosisVSAvoidreporting efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by automatically pre-selecting relevant report modules and configuring appropriate image analysis algorithms based on the clinical indication and image metadata before the radiologist begins review. This preliminary setup reduces the initial cognitive load and establishes a structured workflow that guides the radiologist through necessary diagnostic steps

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where the results from automated image analysis and module execution are continuously fed back to update the reporting workflow. This feedback loop automatically adjusts which modules are active, what additional analyses are needed, and how results are synthesized, maintaining diagnostic completeness while reducing manual management overhead

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If free-text reports are used for medical reporting, then flexibility in expression is maintained, but machine-readability and standardization are lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility in reportingVSAvoidmachine-readability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system creates report modules that serve multiple functions simultaneously: they provide structured, machine-readable output for data extraction and analysis, while also generating human-readable narrative text that maintains clinical flexibility and expression. Each module is designed to be adaptable to different clinical scenarios while preserving standardized data elements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20240212809A1Orchestration of medical report modules and image analysis algorithms
Publication Date: 2024.06.27 QMEDIFY
  • US20240212809A1 patent drawing
  • US20240212809A1 patent drawing
  • US20240212809A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for generating medical reports, includes analyzing interdisciplinary first medical data to automatically select report modules and to select, launch, and orchestrate image analysis algorithms. This is achieved through automated iterative selection of report modules and image analysis algorithms based on available interdisciplinary data including at least the results of the selected image analysis algorithms. This resulting information and data is characterized by a high level of detail and unambiguousness. Based on this information and data, a medical report is automatically created.