Medical Transcript Annotation System for Clinical Documentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Unannotated transcripts of medical encounters are of limited usefulness for physicians and require extensive review to find relevant information, and there is a need for methods to generate annotated transcripts with highlighted medical concepts and related phrases for training machine learning models.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that facilitate annotation of medical practitioner-patient conversations by providing tools for highlighting, labeling, and grouping text spans in transcripts, using predefined medical entities and attributes, allowing for efficient annotation and grouping of related information.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If transcripts are left unannotated, then the annotation process requires no time or resources, but physicians must spend extensive time reviewing transcripts to find relevant information

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetime for physicians to review transcriptsVSAvoidannotation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary annotation actions by automatically generating transcripts and pre-identifying potential medical entities before physician review. This preliminary processing reduces the time physicians need to spend searching for relevant information while maintaining high annotation quality through structured preparation of the transcript data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary annotation layer between the raw transcript and the physician. This intermediary process automatically highlights and structures medical entities, symptoms, and treatments, serving as a mediator that reduces the cognitive load and time required for physicians to extract relevant information without replacing the need for professional medical judgment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If manual annotation is performed without automated tools, then the annotation process is simple and direct, but it requires extensive human time and effort

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveannotation throughputVSAvoidannotation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces the mechanical process of manual annotation with an automated computational system. Machine learning models and natural language processing algorithms substitute for human annotators in identifying and categorizing medical entities, dramatically increasing annotation throughput while reducing the time and effort required for processing large volumes of transcript data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The annotation system performs self-service by automatically processing transcripts without requiring extensive human intervention. The system autonomously identifies medical entities, assigns categories, and structures information, enabling high-productivity annotation operations to occur with minimal human time investment while maintaining consistent quality standards.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If comprehensive annotation is applied to all transcripts, then high-quality labeled data is generated for machine learning training, but the complexity of the annotation process increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality of training dataVSAvoidannotation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by focusing annotation efforts on specific, relevant portions of transcripts rather than uniformly processing all text. It identifies and annotates only the medical entities, symptoms, and treatments that are locally significant to clinical contexts, thereby generating high-quality training data while avoiding the complexity of comprehensive annotation of every word in every transcript.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The annotation process is segmented into distinct modular components: transcript generation, entity identification, category assignment, and quality validation. This segmentation allows the system to achieve comprehensive annotation quality through specialized sub-processes rather than a single complex monolithic system, reducing overall complexity while maintaining high reliability of the generated training data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11521722B2Capturing detailed structure from patient-doctor conversations for use in clinical documentation
Publication Date: 2022.12.06 GOOGLE LLC
  • US11521722B2 patent drawing
  • US11521722B2 patent drawing
  • US11521722B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and system is provided for assisting a user to assign a label to words or spans of text in a transcript of a conversation between a patient and a medical professional and form groupings of such labelled words or spans of text in the transcript. The transcript is displayed on an interface of a workstation. A tool is provided for highlighting spans of text in the transcript consisting of one or more words. Another tool is provided for assigning a label to the highlighted spans of text. This tool includes a feature enabling searching through a set of predefined labels available for assignment to the highlighted span of text. The predefined labels encode medical entities and attributes of the medical entities. The interface further includes a tool for creating groupings of related highlighted spans of texts. The tools can consist of mouse action or key strokes or a combination thereof.