Medication Cabinet Drawer with Motorized Selective Access Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Medical items, such as medications and instruments, require controlled-access storage to prevent misuse, theft, or errors, but existing storage solutions lack secure and controllable access mechanisms.

Innovation Solution

A drawer assembly or cabinet with a slidable drawer unit and a movable cover or belt, actuated by an electric actuator and controlled by a user interface, which provides selective access based on authorization and stores access information, ensuring secure storage and controlled distribution of medical items.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional storage solutions are used for medical items, then access is easy and simple, but security and controlled access are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoidaccess control
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic access control through motorized drawers that can move between locked and unlocked positions based on authorization. The system dynamically adjusts access rights for different user roles (nurses, pharmacists, doctors) and tracks access history, transforming static storage into an adaptive security system that responds to user credentials and real-time conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary control system between the user and the stored items. This intermediary includes authorization verification mechanisms, motorized actuators, and control interfaces that mediate access requests. The system acts as a gatekeeper, verifying credentials and controlling drawer movement, thereby providing security without completely blocking legitimate access.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If secure locked storage is implemented, then unauthorized access is prevented, but authorized access becomes more complex and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccess securityVSAvoidaccess time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary action by pre-authorizing users before access is needed. The system stores credential information and authorization levels in advance, so when a user attempts access, the verification process is rapid rather than requiring complex real-time authentication. Drawers can be pre-configured for specific user roles, enabling quick access decisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical locking systems with motorized actuators controlled by an electronic system. This substitution eliminates the need for physical keys or complex mechanical locks, allowing authorized users to access drawers through simplified electronic verification. The motorized system provides controlled movement while maintaining security, reducing both access time and mechanical complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Measurement precision

If manual tracking of item distribution is used, then system complexity is low, but accuracy and error prevention are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccess tracking accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements comprehensive feedback mechanisms that automatically track and record all access events. The system monitors which user accessed which drawer, what items were removed, and timestamps each transaction. This feedback is stored and can be reviewed to ensure proper protocol adherence, providing accurate tracking without requiring manual record-keeping. The feedback loop enables audit trails and error detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-service tracking by automatically recording access information without human intervention. Sensors and control systems automatically log user credentials, drawer positions, and item movements. This eliminates the need for manual tracking while providing precise, error-free records of all transactions, reducing both complexity and improving accuracy simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Reliability

If individual drawer access control is implemented, then security is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrolled accessVSAvoidcabinet complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies universality by using a single integrated control system that manages multiple drawers with different access requirements. The same authorization verification mechanism and motorized actuator technology are applied across all drawers, providing consistent security protocols. The system can accommodate various user roles and access levels within a unified framework, reducing overall complexity compared to implementing separate systems for each drawer.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS9888774B2Medication cabinetry
Publication Date: 2018.02.13 ARXIUM INC
  • US9888774B2 patent drawing
  • US9888774B2 patent drawing
  • US9888774B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An exemplary embodiment includes a cabinet having at least one drawer with selectable access for storing items, such as medications. A slidable cover with a first opening allows for closure and/or access to items in an interior of the drawer. The cabinet further includes an actuator coupled to the cover and a controller coupled to the actuator to control movement of the first opening relative to the drawer interior in response to signals generated from a user interface.