Real-Time Meeting Communication System with Participant Behavior Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current communication systems for meetings and events face challenges such as inconsistent agenda distribution, lack of clear objectives, inadequate participant preparation, uninvited attendees, and inefficient scheduling, leading to reduced productivity and morale.

Innovation Solution

A real-time event and participant communication system with intelligent interface actions that manages meetings and participants, providing unified and integrated solutions for agenda creation, participant tracking, and behavior analysis to enhance user experience and meeting outcomes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If agendas are distributed immediately before a meeting, then meeting leaders can send agendas quickly, but participants have little time to review and suggest changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetime for agenda reviewVSAvoidmeeting preparation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically distributes agendas to participants in advance of the meeting, enabling participants to review and prepare beforehand. This preliminary action eliminates the need for last-minute distribution and allows sufficient time for participants to engage with the agenda content.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system collects and integrates participant feedback on agenda items before the meeting occurs. This feedback mechanism allows participants to suggest changes and modifications in advance, which are then incorporated into the final meeting agenda, improving both preparation time utilization and meeting effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If meeting leaders create custom agendas manually, then agendas can be tailored to specific needs, but this process is time-consuming and inconsistent

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveagenda customizationVSAvoidtime for agenda creation
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the agenda creation process into standardized segments or templates that can be selectively combined. This segmentation allows the system to generate customized agendas efficiently by assembling pre-defined sections rather than creating everything from scratch, maintaining adaptability while reducing time investment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system allows meeting leaders to adjust key parameters such as meeting duration, agenda items, and timing parameters to customize agendas to specific needs. This parameter-based customization enables tailored agendas to be generated quickly through automated adjustments rather than manual creation from scratch.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If agendas are made interactive and changeable during meetings, then flexibility is improved, but participants still arrive unprepared and meetings lack focus

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveagenda flexibilityVSAvoidmeeting objective achievement
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system distributes the agenda and relevant materials to participants before the meeting starts, ensuring they arrive prepared. This preliminary distribution maintains agenda flexibility during the meeting while ensuring participants are ready to contribute meaningfully, thereby improving meeting objective achievement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates real-time feedback mechanisms that allow participants to indicate their level of preparation and engagement during the meeting. This feedback enables the system to adjust the agenda dynamically while ensuring participants are adequately prepared, balancing flexibility with meeting effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Reliability

If the system tracks and analyzes participant behavior, then meeting quality can be improved, but this requires monitoring and data collection infrastructure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeeting qualityVSAvoidbehavior analysis system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically collects and analyzes participant behavior data without requiring manual intervention or complex external monitoring infrastructure. Participants naturally interact with the system during meetings, and the system self-service manner captures relevant behavioral patterns to improve meeting quality through automated analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses behavior analysis to provide real-time feedback to meeting leaders and participants about meeting dynamics and effectiveness. This feedback loop enables continuous improvement of meeting quality by adjusting based on actual participant behavior patterns, achieving reliable quality enhancement through intelligent data utilization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20240259446A1Real-Time Event and Participant Communication Systems
Publication Date: 2024.08.01 STRETCH MEETINGS INC
  • US20240259446A1 patent drawing
  • US20240259446A1 patent drawing
  • US20240259446A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for improving event and user communications and experiences. (e.g., managing meetings and their participants) is disclosed. By treating events such as meetings and their participants (meeting leaders and invited attendees) as a managed system, the present invention improves the quality and outcomes of meetings and the satisfaction of the participants. The present invention also makes joining of this intelligently-managed system particularly simple for new as well as returning participants, by providing a unique approach to the issues at the pre-meeting, meeting, and post-meeting phases in order to generate scores for the particular meeting, each participant (meeting leader and attendees), and a meeting graph linking the performance of each participant (meeting leader and attendees). This score is used to adjust and predict participant (meeting leader and attendees) behavior in subsequent meetings. The system advantageously is not intrusive into the meeting (and meeting set up), yet is configured to obtain useful changes in behavior in meetings.