Magnetoencephalography Sensor Array Orientation for Error Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Magnetoencephalography (MEG) systems face challenges in minimizing errors caused by non-neuromagnetic fields, which are significant due to the small magnitude of neuromagnetic fields and the interference from background magnetic fields, leading to inaccuracies in source reconstruction.

Innovation Solution

The method involves measuring magnetic fields at multiple discrete locations around a subject's head in different directions to reduce the correlation between neuromagnetic and non-neuromagnetic field contributions, using a sensor array with sensors configured to measure magnetic fields along various orientations, such as radial and tangential axes, to suppress errors in source reconstruction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If magnetic shielding techniques are used to reduce background fields, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveMEG measurement precisionVSAvoidshielding system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes the harmful non-neuromagnetic field components from the sensor data through signal processing. Instead of physically shielding against all background fields, the method identifies and eliminates the specific interfering field contributions computationally, thereby reducing measurement errors without requiring complex physical shielding structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary computational process (signal processing algorithm) that acts as a mediator between the raw sensor data and the final measurement result. This intermediary processing step separates the neuromagnetic signal from non-neuromagnetic interference, achieving precise measurements without direct physical shielding.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If gradiometer configurations are used to suppress background fields, then measurement precision is improved, but device weight and bulk increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveMEG measurement precisionVSAvoidsensor array weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical/physical gradiometer configuration with a computational approach. Instead of using additional physical sensors arranged in gradiometer patterns to measure and subtract background fields, the method uses signal processing algorithms to identify and remove non-neuromagnetic field contributions, thereby achieving the same precision improvement without the added weight and bulk.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Measurement precision

If complex signal processing techniques are used to compensate for background fields, then measurement precision is improved, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveMEG measurement precisionVSAvoidsignal processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs signal processing techniques that leverage the inherent characteristics of the measured data itself to identify and remove interference. The method uses the spatial and temporal patterns present in the sensor data to automatically distinguish neuromagnetic signals from non-neuromagnetic background fields, reducing the need for external complex processing and enabling self-correcting measurements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances the robustness of MEG measurements by reducing errors associated with non-neuromagnetic fields, allowing for more accurate reconstruction of neuronal activity and improving motion robustness, without the need for bulky shielding or complex signal processing.

Implementation Method 1

measuring, using a sensor array for measuring neuromagnetic fields, magnetic field at a plurality of discrete locations around a subject's head

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic field measurement: Magnetic Field

Implementation Method 2

measuring magnetic fields at multiple discrete locations around a subject's head in different directions to reduce the correlation between neuromagnetic and non-neuromagnetic field contributions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectField correlation:

Data Source

PatentUS20240000359A1Magnetoencephalography method and system
Publication Date: 2024.01.04 UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM
  • US20240000359A1 patent drawing
  • US20240000359A1 patent drawing
  • US20240000359A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of reducing error in magnetoencephalography arising from the presence of a non-neuromagnetic field. The method comprises measuring, using a sensor array for measuring neuromagnetic fields, magnetic field at a plurality of discrete locations around a subject's head to provide sensor data; wherein the magnetic field measured at at least some of the locations includes a neuromagnetic field from a source of interest within a subject's brain and a non-neuromagnetic field from a source of no interest external to the brain. The measuring comprises: measuring, at at least a first subset of the locations, a magnetic field along a first direction relative to a radial axis intersecting the respective location, and measuring, at at least a second subset of the locations, a magnetic field along a second direction relative to a radial axis intersecting the respective location which is different to the first direction; and performing source reconstruction using the sensor data.