Melamine Reactor Heating Elements in Central Duct

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional high-pressure reactors for melamine synthesis face challenges due to complex and costly tube bundle designs, high maintenance downtime, and leakage risks from large, thick flanges and difficult access to the urea inlet, which increase operational costs and downtime.

Innovation Solution

A reactor design with heating elements arranged inside a central duct, creating an inner reaction zone and a peripheral reaction zone without heating elements, allowing for a descending flow in the heated zone and an ascending recirculating flow in the non-heated peripheral zone, simplifying construction and maintenance by reducing the size and complexity of the heating bundle and flange requirements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Use of energy by moving object

If the tube bundle outer diameter is made almost equivalent to the reactor body diameter to achieve sufficient heating surface area, then the heating efficiency is improved, but the flange and tubesheet become thick, heavy, costly and difficult to maintain

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheating efficiencyVSAvoidflange and tubesheet complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The heating tubes are rearranged from a conventional annular configuration to a three-dimensional structure extending vertically through the reactor center. The tubes are positioned at different heights and angles, creating a space-filling arrangement that provides sufficient heating surface area without requiring large radial dimensions, thus reducing flange and tubesheet sizes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Use of energy by moving object

If the tube bundle is designed with large diameter to provide adequate heating surface, then the thermal performance is improved, but the maintenance downtime increases due to difficulty in disconnecting and reconnecting the urea inlet

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethermal performanceVSAvoidmaintenance downtime
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The heating tube bundle is divided into multiple sections at different vertical levels. Each section can be independently accessed and maintained. The urea inlet connections are distributed at various heights, allowing maintenance personnel to work on one section at a time without disconnecting the entire bundle, thereby reducing maintenance downtime.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Strength

If the flange size is increased to accommodate large tube bundle diameter, then the structural integrity is improved, but the manufacturing cost and operational risk increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The design transitions from a radial arrangement requiring large flange diameter to a vertical three-dimensional arrangement. The flange diameter is reduced to accommodate a smaller tube bundle outer diameter, while the heating surface area is maintained through increased vertical extent and multi-level positioning of tubes, thereby reducing manufacturing cost and operational risk.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration results in a more compact, cost-effective reactor with reduced downtime and manufacturing challenges, maintaining familiar process conditions while simplifying maintenance and reducing the risk of leaks and operational costs.

Implementation Method 1

a set of heating elements arranged inside said central duct

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal energy conversion: Heating

Implementation Method 2

a flow circulates in said prior art reactor by ascending the central duct and descending the annular region around the central duct

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluid circulation: Convection

Data Source

PatentEP3116639B1High pressure reactor and process for the synthesis of melamine
Publication Date: 2020.04.29 CASALE SA
  • EP3116639B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3116639B1 patent drawingFigure 2

AI summary

Reactor for the synthesis of melamine from urea, in accordance with the high- pressure non-catalytic process, comprising: a vertical reactor body (1), at least one inlet (2) for the urea melt, a set of heating elements (3), and a central duct (7), said set of heating elements (3) being arranged inside said central duct.