Melt Pool Boundary Mapping for Additive Manufacturing Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Prior art additive manufacturing machines operate in an open loop environment, unable to monitor the stability of the process in real-time, leading to undetected machine issues and subsequent scrapping of work in progress during the manufacturing process.

Innovation Solution

Implementing an imaging apparatus to generate images of the melt pool, characterizing its morphology and dynamics, and controlling the additive manufacturing process based on the mapped melt pool boundary, using measurements of physical properties such as color, emission frequency, and Z-height to define the melt pool boundary and adjust process parameters accordingly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If real-time melt pool monitoring is implemented, then process stability detection is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess stability detectionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback by capturing melt pool images with a camera, processing the images to extract features (area, circularity, aspect ratio, temperature), and using these features to detect process stability. The system continuously monitors and adjusts parameters based on real-time melt pool characteristics, creating a closed-loop control system that improves reliability without requiring overly complex hardware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces complex mechanical sensing systems with optical imaging and computational analysis. Instead of using sophisticated physical sensors to directly measure melt pool properties, the system uses a standard camera to capture images and processes these images computationally to extract meaningful features for stability detection, thereby reducing device complexity while maintaining monitoring capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Manufacturing precision

If quality inspection is performed after build completion, then manufacturing precision is maintained, but loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworkpiece qualityVSAvoidinspection time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary quality assessment by monitoring melt pool characteristics during the additive manufacturing process itself. By detecting anomalies in real-time (such as abnormal melt pool area, circularity, or temperature patterns), the system can identify potential quality issues before they result in defective workpieces, enabling early intervention or process adjustment rather than waiting for post-build inspection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent enables skipping of time-consuming post-build quality inspection by performing rapid real-time monitoring during manufacturing. The system processes melt pool images continuously and can quickly detect process deviations, allowing for immediate corrective action without needing to wait for the entire build to complete before assessing quality, thus significantly reducing total inspection time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #21Skipping (Rushing through)

3Productivity

If real-time process control is implemented, then productivity is improved through reduced scrap, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing efficiencyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback control by continuously monitoring melt pool images, extracting features (area, circularity, aspect ratio, temperature), comparing these features against expected ranges, and adjusting process parameters in real-time to maintain optimal melt pool characteristics. This closed-loop control reduces scrap by preventing defects before they occur, improving productivity despite the added control system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent achieves real-time process control by dynamically adjusting manufacturing parameters (such as laser power, scan speed, or hatch spacing) based on observed melt pool characteristics. When the system detects deviations in melt pool area, shape, or temperature, it modifies process parameters to bring the melt pool back within acceptable ranges, thereby maintaining quality and reducing scrap rates without requiring fundamentally new equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables real-time monitoring and control of the additive manufacturing process, reducing scrap rates by detecting issues promptly and maintaining process stability, thereby improving the quality and efficiency of the manufacturing process.

Implementation Method 1

the image including a measurement of, for each of the individual image elements, of two or more physical properties selected from the group including: image element color, emission frequency, and image element sheen

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEmission frequency: Incandescence

Data Source

PatentUS11679548B2Method for melt pool monitoring
Publication Date: 2023.06.20 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO
  • US11679548B2 patent drawing
  • US11679548B2 patent drawing
  • US11679548B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of controlling a manufacturing process in which directed energy selectively melts material, forming a melt pool. The method includes: generating an image having an array of individual image elements, the image including measurement, for each image element, of two or more physical properties from the group including: color, emission frequency, and sheen, the measurements collectively indicating presence of: liquid phase, melting, or incipient melting; from the measurements, mapping a boundary of the melt pool, wherein for each of the measurements that indicate liquid phase, melting, or incipient melting, corresponding image elements are defined to be inside the boundary, and wherein for each of the measurements that do not indicate liquid phase, melting, or incipient melting, the corresponding image elements are defined to be outside of the boundary; and controlling at least one aspect of the additive manufacturing process with reference to the boundary.