Melt Pool Monitoring for Real-Time Powder Bed Fault Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional melt pool monitoring systems in additive manufacturing machines are ineffective in real-time detection of process faults during operation, leading to quality issues, material waste, and machine downtime.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that irradiate a powder bed, measure emission signals, identify outlier emissions exceeding a threshold, assess spatial proximity to detect clusters, and generate alerts to correct process faults in real-time, using a melt pool monitoring system with sensors and clustering algorithms.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional melt pool monitoring systems are used to monitor the additive manufacturing process, then quality evaluation can be performed after build completion, but real-time detection of process faults is not achieved, leading to continued material waste and machine downtime

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidmachine downtime
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary detection of process faults during the build process itself, rather than waiting until completion. By continuously monitoring emission signals and identifying outliers in real-time, the system detects anomalies before they result in defective parts, allowing for immediate corrective action that prevents material waste and reduces machine downtime.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements real-time feedback by continuously monitoring emission signals from the melt pool, comparing them against expected ranges, and immediately identifying when outliers occur. This feedback loop enables the system to detect process faults as they happen and alert operators or automatically adjust parameters, rather than providing delayed feedback after the build is complete.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If conventional melt pool monitoring systems perform data analysis after build completion, then comprehensive quality evaluation is possible, but the system is delayed in identifying process issues, resulting in scrapped parts and increased material costs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality evaluationVSAvoidmaterial waste
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs quality evaluation during the build process by monitoring emission signals in real-time, rather than waiting until completion. This preliminary detection identifies process faults before they result in defective parts, allowing for immediate corrective action that prevents material waste while maintaining reliable quality evaluation through continuous monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system rushes through the detection process by providing real-time monitoring and immediate identification of process faults during the build, rather than delaying analysis until completion. This approach skips the waiting period inherent in conventional systems, enabling rapid detection and correction that prevents scrapped parts and reduces material waste.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #21Skipping (Rushing through)

3Productivity

If conventional melt pool monitoring systems are used, then the build process can continue without interruption, but the system is ineffective at identifying process faults that result in quality issues and excessive machine downtime

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebuild continuityVSAvoidfault detection effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements effective feedback by continuously monitoring emission signals and immediately identifying when outliers occur during the build process. This real-time feedback enables the system to detect process faults as they happen while maintaining build continuity, allowing for prompt corrective action that prevents quality issues without causing excessive machine downtime.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-monitoring and self-diagnosis by automatically detecting process faults through emission signal analysis. This self-service capability enables the system to identify issues during normal operation without requiring external intervention, maintaining productivity while improving reliability through effective fault detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables immediate detection and correction of print errors, reducing material waste, downtime, and increasing operational efficiency by identifying and addressing process faults in real-time.

Implementation Method 1

an energy source such as an irradiation emission directing device that directs an energy beam, for example, an electron beam or a laser beam, to sinter or melt a powder material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaser heating: Laser

Implementation Method 2

the energy beam sinters or melts a cross sectional layer of the object being built

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMelting: Melting

Implementation Method 3

one or more cameras or light sensors for detecting light that is radiated or otherwise emitted from the melt pool

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal radiation: Thermal Radiation

Data Source

PatentUS11806925B2Additive manufacturing process
Publication Date: 2023.11.07 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO
  • US11806925B2 patent drawing
  • US11806925B2 patent drawing
  • US11806925B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method of monitoring a powder-bed additive manufacturing process is provided where a layer of additive powder is fused using an energy source and electromagnetic emission signals are measured by a melt pool monitoring system to monitor the print process. The measured emission signals are analyzed to identify outlier emissions and clusters of outliers are identified by assessing the spatial proximity of the outlier emissions, e.g., using clustering algorithms, spatial control charts, etc. An alert may be provided or a process adjustment may be made when a cluster is identified or when a magnitude of a cluster exceeds a predetermined cluster threshold.