Melt Pool Shaping in Superalloy Welding to Reduce Solidification Cracking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Joining processes, such as keyhole and conduction welding, face issues with segregation of low melting point elements, concentrated tensile stress, and void entrapment due to tear drop-shaped melt pools, leading to solidification cracking and defects.

Innovation Solution

A process that applies a first and second amount of energy to shape the melt pool with a curvilinear and curviplanar solid/liquid interface, reducing segregation and stress concentration by broadening the melt pool at the trailing edge and distributing stress, thereby minimizing void entrapment and enhancing weld strength.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If keyhole welding is used to achieve deep penetration, then welding speed and productivity are improved, but void entrapment and porosity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewelding speedVSAvoidvoid entrapment
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies a curvilinear and curviplanar energy trajectory to shape the melt pool with curved solid/liquid interfaces, replacing the traditional linear tear-drop shape. This curvature modification allows for controlled solidification patterns that reduce void entrapment while maintaining deep penetration welding capabilities

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent modifies the energy delivery parameters by applying different amounts of energy at different locations and times during the welding process. This dynamic parameter adjustment controls melt pool shape evolution and solidification behavior to minimize porosity formation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Length of stationary object

If tear drop-shaped melt pool is formed, then deep penetration is achieved, but segregation of low melting point elements increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepenetration depthVSAvoidsegregation
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of stationary objectVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The curvilinear energy trajectory creates a contoured melt pool shape with curved solid/liquid interfaces, which modifies the solidification pattern from the traditional linear tear-drop shape. This curvature promotes more uniform solute distribution and reduces segregation of low melting point elements during solidification

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from a 2D linear energy path to a 3D curvilinear trajectory that varies in multiple dimensions. This dimensional complexity allows control over heat flow patterns and solidification front geometry, reducing elemental segregation while maintaining penetration depth

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Ease of operation

If linear solid liquid interface is used, then simple process control is maintained, but stress concentration and cracking increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess controlVSAvoidcrack resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements curvilinear and curviplanar solid/liquid interfaces instead of linear interfaces. This curvature distributes thermal gradients and solidification stresses more uniformly throughout the weld pool, reducing stress concentration points that lead to cracking

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Solution Approach 2:

The energy trajectory and melt pool shape are dynamically adjusted during the welding process. The curvilinear path allows real-time modification of heat input distribution, enabling adaptive stress management while maintaining relatively simple overall process control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Object-generated harmful factors

If conduction welding is used to reduce keyhole defects, then void entrapment is reduced, but welding speed and productivity decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevoid entrapmentVSAvoidwelding speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the energy delivery process into distinct phases with different energy amounts and trajectories. The first amount of energy creates initial melt pool formation, while the second amount shapes the trailing edge, allowing control of solidification to reduce voids while maintaining faster welding speeds than conventional conduction welding

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies a preliminary energy input to establish the melt pool geometry before the main welding energy is applied. This preliminary shaping action controls the solidification pattern in advance, preventing void entrapment while enabling faster subsequent welding

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The contoured melt pool shape reduces the likelihood of weld solidification cracking, improves stress distribution, and minimizes deep penetration weld defects by providing more area for contaminants and voids to escape, resulting in a stronger solidified weld bead.

Implementation Method 1

applying a first amount of energy and a second amount of energy to a substrate effective to provide a melt pool

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal energy: Heating

Implementation Method 2

The molten material of the melt pool solidifies into a weld bead behind the keyhole as the keyhole advances

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSolidification: Freezing

Data Source

PatentUS11440138B2Optimization of melt pool shape in a joining process
Publication Date: 2022.09.13 SIEMENS ENERGY INC
  • US11440138B2 patent drawing
  • US11440138B2 patent drawing
  • US11440138B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A process of welding a superalloy is provided. The process includes applying a first amount of energy to a substrate comprised of the superalloy to form a melt pool along a length of the substrate and in a weld direction. The process also comprises advancing the melt pool in the weld direction along the length via the first amount of energy, the melt pool having a width transverse to the weld direction. Further, the process includes applying a second amount of energy to the substrate that extends outside the width of the melt pool at a trailing edge of the melt pool, which second amount of energy causes, relative to a process without application of the second amount of energy: broadening of the width of the melt pool at the trailing edge of the melt pool as the melt pool advances in the weld direction; and reducing segregation of artifacts and stress concentration along a centerline of the width.