Deformable Membrane Bottom for Hot-Fill Container Stability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional stretch-blow molding of thermoplastic containers induces residual stresses that cause deformation during hot-filling, leading to unsuitable containers due to bi-orientation and subsequent retraction effects, which existing solutions fail to adequately address, especially under demanding visual quality criteria.

Innovation Solution

A plastic container design featuring a rigidified body with a deformable annular membrane in the shape of a spherical cap at the bottom, incorporating ribs and a recess structure that allows for controlled deformation during hot-filling and cooling, combined with heat-setting to enhance mechanical and aesthetic properties.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If stretch-blow molding is used to produce containers, then structural rigidity is improved through bi-orientation of material, but residual stresses are induced that cause deformation during hot-filling

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural rigidityVSAvoidcontainer shape stability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The bottom of the container is segmented into distinct functional zones: a deformable membrane area that can accommodate stress-induced deformations, a flat region for structural stability, and a reinforced zone with ribs. This segmentation allows different parts of the bottom to respond differently to residual stresses, with the membrane absorbing deformations while other areas maintain shape stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the container bottom are given different mechanical properties. The membrane region is designed to be more compliant and deformable, while the flat region and rib-reinforced areas provide rigidity and shape stability. This local differentiation of material properties allows the container to simultaneously achieve overall structural rigidity while accommodating localized stress relief through controlled deformations in specific areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Manufacturing precision

If heat set treatment is applied to decrease deformation during hot-filling, then residual stresses are partially relieved, but the container still undergoes retraction during cooling that affects visual quality

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeformation control during hot-fillingVSAvoidvisual quality after cooling
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

The container bottom is pre-formed with a specific geometry including a deformable membrane with predetermined curvature radius (50-150 mm) and a flat region. This preliminary shaping creates built-in compliance that anticipates and accommodates the retraction that occurs during cooling, allowing the container to maintain visual quality despite the volume decrease of the liquid and air during cooling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The membrane's curvature radius is specifically controlled within the range of 50-150 mm to optimize its deformability. This parameter control allows the membrane to sufficiently deform during cooling to accommodate retraction while maintaining adequate structural support. The geometric parameters of the bottom structure (membrane curvature, flat region extent, rib positioning) are optimized to balance deformation capacity with visual appearance requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Shape

If the body of the container is equipped with deformable panels to absorb retraction, then visual quality is improved, but structural complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevisual quality during retractionVSAvoidcontainer structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The deformability function is extracted from the main container body and concentrated specifically in the bottom membrane region. This allows the body to remain simple and rigid while the bottom provides the necessary compliance for absorbing retraction. The complexity is localized to the bottom structure rather than being distributed throughout the entire container, simplifying manufacturing and design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Strength

If ribs are added to the bottom structure to enhance deformation control, then mechanical strength is improved, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical strength of bottomVSAvoidbottom structure fabrication
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The membrane is given a spherical cap geometry with a controlled curvature radius (50-150 mm). This curved geometry inherently provides structural strength while allowing uniform deformation distribution during hot-filling and cooling. The curvature naturally reinforces the membrane without requiring additional complex rib structures, simplifying manufacturing while maintaining mechanical strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The container design localizes deformations on the bottom, preserving the body's shape during hot-filling and cooling, while heat-setting increases material crystallinity, resulting in improved mechanical strength and visual appeal by minimizing uncontrolled deformations and retraction effects.

Implementation Method 1

a deformable annular membrane in the shape of a spherical cap extending substantially perpendicular to the body between the step and the recess

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic deformation: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

it is known to complete the stretch-blow molding through a thermal treatment called heat set, by which the just-formed container is held in contact with the wall of the heated mold at a temperature between 120° C. and 250° C. for a predetermined time

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCrystallization: Crystallisation

Implementation Method 3

through a thermal treatment called heat set, by which the just-formed container is held in contact with the wall of the heated mold

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal treatment: Heat Treatment

Implementation Method 4

while cooling, the liquid and the air above the liquid in the capped container undergo a decrease in volume that tends to make the container retract

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal contraction: Thermal Contraction

Data Source

PatentUS8950611B2Container comprising a bottom equipped with a deformable membrane
Publication Date: 2015.02.10 SIDEL PARTICIPATIONS SAS
  • US8950611B2 patent drawing
  • US8950611B2 patent drawing
  • US8950611B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Plastic container (1), characterized in that it comprises:a rigidified body (5),a bottom (8) extending to a lower end of the container (1) and comprising:an annular base (9) extending substantially perpendicular to the body (5) in the prolongation thereof;an annular step (10) extending from the base (9) towards the interior of the container (1),a recess (12) at the center of the bottom (8) projecting towards the interior of the container (1),a deformable annular membrane (11) in the shape of a spherical cap extending substantially perpendicular to the body (5) between the step (10) and the recess (12).