Force-Feedback Exoskeleton Actuator With Membrane-Controlled Braking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing force feedback exoskeletons face challenges in integrating miniaturized actuators that can be comfortably worn on the hand and function reliably over numerous actuation cycles, with passive actuators being compact but lacking the ability to perform work, and active actuators being large and potentially hazardous.

Innovation Solution

An actuator assembly comprising a rotating body coupled to a tendon and a spring, with a membrane-controlled braking mechanism using a pressurized fluid source to apply variable forces, allowing for compact design and reliable operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Weight of moving object

If passive force feedback actuators are used, then the device size and weight are reduced, but the ability to perform work on the user's body is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactuator weightVSAvoidwork capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically switches between passive brake mode (for size/weight benefits) and active motor mode (for work capability) based on operational requirements. The motor can actively drive the tendon when work is needed, while the brake provides passive resistance when compact size is prioritized.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The actuator assembly integrates both motor-driven active components and brake-driven passive components into a single multi-functional unit. This allows the same device to provide both active force generation and passive force resistance, eliminating the need for separate actuator systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Power

If active force feedback actuators are used, then the ability to perform work is improved, but the device size and weight increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvework capabilityVSAvoidactuator weight
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the motor and brake into a single integrated actuator assembly that shares common structural elements, such as the rotating body and tendon coupling mechanism. This merging reduces the total weight and size compared to having separate active and passive actuators.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically switches between passive brake mode (for size/weight benefits) and active motor mode (for work capability) based on operational requirements. The motor can actively drive the tendon when work is needed, while the brake provides passive resistance when compact size is prioritized.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Object-affected harmful factors

If passive force feedback actuators are used, then the device is inherently safer, but the ability to provide variable force feedback is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser safetyVSAvoidforce feedback capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The actuator assembly integrates both motor-driven active components and brake-driven passive components into a single multi-functional unit. This allows the same device to provide both active force generation and passive force resistance, eliminating the need for separate actuator systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The control system can dynamically switch between passive brake-only mode (maximum safety) and active motor-driven mode (enhanced force feedback capability). The brake continues to provide inherent safety by dissipating energy, while the motor adds versatile force feedback when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Volume of moving object

If miniaturized actuators are integrated, then the wearable comfort is improved, but the reliability over numerous actuation cycles deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactuator volumeVSAvoidactuation cycle reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the motor and brake into a single integrated actuator assembly that shares common structural elements, such as the rotating body and tendon coupling mechanism. This merging reduces the total volume while distributing mechanical stresses across robust shared components designed for high-cycle durability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The brake mechanism provides inherent self-lubrication through friction surfaces and self-adjusting contact pressures that maintain reliable operation over hundreds of thousands of cycles. The passive dissipative nature of the brake reduces thermal buildup and wear compared to continuous active motor operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables a compact, safe, and reliable haptic feedback system that provides variable resistance to user motion, suitable for wearable applications.

Implementation Method 1

a spring, the spring configured to produce a torque on the rotating body

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

a second body having a surface configured to apply a variable force to a surface of the rotating body by means of a membrane enclosing a volume fluidically coupled to at least one control valve and to a pressurized fluid source

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluid pressure: Pressure Increase

Data Source

PatentEP4232886B1Actuator system for force feedback exoskeleton
Publication Date: 2025.09.17 HAPTX INC
  • EP4232886B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4232886B1 patent drawingFigure 2A~2B
  • EP4232886B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Improved actuator and retraction mechanisms for force feedback exoskeletons are described. An actuator assembly for a force-feedback exoskeleton comprising: a rotating body coupled to a tendon and to a spring, said spring configured to produce a torque on the rotating body; and a second body having a surface configured to apply a variable force to a surface of the rotating body by means of a membrane enclosing a volume fluidically coupled to at least one control valve and to a pressurized fluid source, wherein the volume enclosed by the membrane comprises: a first pressure state in which the rotating body contacts the second body; and a second pressure state in which the rotating body does not contact the second body.