Membrane Chamber Composite Forming for Void-Free Curing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional methods for manufacturing composite parts are time-consuming, labor-intensive, and prone to defects such as voids due to entrapped gases, which affect the mechanical, thermal, and electrical properties of the material.

Innovation Solution

A method involving a chamber with upper and lower membranes and controlled vacuum and pressure differentials to form and cure composite materials, minimizing contact with the membranes to remove entrapped gases and shape the material around a forming tool, followed by controlled heating and curing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional vacuum bagging and autoclave curing methods are used, then composite parts can be manufactured with controlled curing, but the process becomes time-consuming and labor-intensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality consistencyVSAvoidmanufacturing cycle time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The chamber is segmented into multiple cavities (upper cavity, middle cavity, lower cavity) separated by membranes, allowing independent vacuum and pressure control for each region. This enables simultaneous degassing, forming, and curing operations in different zones, significantly reducing overall manufacturing cycle time while maintaining quality consistency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The method performs preliminary degassing by applying vacuum to the middle cavity before forming and curing operations. This preliminary action removes entrapped gases that would otherwise cause voids and defects, ensuring quality consistency from the start of the process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Ease of manufacture

If traditional laying up and vacuum bagging methods are used, then composite materials can be formed, but entrapped gases cause voids that reduce material quality

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess simplicityVSAvoiddefect freedom
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The process is segmented into distinct phases: degassing phase (vacuum on middle cavity), forming phase (pressure differential applied), and curing phase (heat and pressure applied). This segmentation allows each operation to be optimized independently, achieving both ease of manufacture and defect-free results.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The harmful entrapped gases are extracted from the composite material by applying vacuum to the middle cavity during the degassing phase. This extraction of harmful elements before forming eliminates the root cause of voids and defects, ensuring manufacturing precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Shape

If pressure is applied uniformly during forming, then composite material can be shaped, but complex multi-parameter control is required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveforming accuracyVSAvoidparameter control complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The pressure control system is segmented into independent control zones (upper cavity, middle cavity, lower cavity) with separate vacuum ports and pressure control valves. This allows simple independent control of each zone rather than complex coordinated control, achieving forming accuracy through localized pressure management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The membranes act as intermediaries between the pressure control system and the composite material. By controlling pressure in the cavities, the membranes transmit and distribute pressure uniformly to the material, simplifying the control mechanism while ensuring accurate forming.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Shape

If membranes are used to contain and form composite material, then material can be shaped around forming tools, but membrane contact may trap gases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveforming capabilityVSAvoidgas entrapment
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The containment system is segmented into multiple cavities with membranes separating them. The middle cavity is dedicated to degassing operations, allowing gases to be removed before the forming and curing phases. This segmentation prevents gas entrapment while maintaining forming capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The degassing operation is performed as a preliminary action before forming and curing. By applying vacuum to the middle cavity first, all entrapped gases are removed while the material is still accessible, preventing subsequent gas entrapment during membrane contact in the forming phase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method produces high-quality, defect-free composite parts with enhanced structural integrity and properties by ensuring uniform de-gassing and controlled forming and curing processes.

Implementation Method 1

applying a vacuum to the upper cavity, the middle cavity, and the lower cavity to remove at least a portion of gas entrapped within the uncured composite material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVacuum: Vacuum

Implementation Method 2

controlling pressure in the upper cavity and the lower cavity to form the heated composite material, wherein a greater pressure is applied to the lower cavity than to the upper cavity such that a pressure differential between the lower cavity and the upper cavity causes the heated composite material to form around the forming tool

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure differential: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 3

heating the chamber to a forming temperature of the uncured composite material to yield a heated composite material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeating: Heating

Implementation Method 4

heating the chamber to a curing temperature to cure the heated composite material, thereby yielding a cured composite material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCuring:

Data Source

PatentEP4530051B1Methods and systems for forming composite parts
Publication Date: 2026.04.08 THE BOEING CO
  • EP4530051B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4530051B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4530051B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A method for forming composite parts includes loading an uncured composite material into a middle cavity of a chamber between an upper membrane and a lower membrane, wherein a lower cavity is defined below the lower membrane, and wherein an upper cavity is defined above the upper membrane, wherein a forming tool is disposed within the upper cavity. A vacuum is applied to the upper cavity, the middle cavity, and the lower cavity to remove at least a portion of gas entrapped within the uncured composite material. The vacuum is released from the upper cavity and the lower cavity, and the chamber is heated to a forming temperature of the uncured composite material. Pressure is controlled in the upper cavity and the lower cavity to form the heated composite material, wherein a greater pressure is applied to the lower cavity than to the upper cavity such that a pressure differential between the lower cavity and the upper cavity causes the heated composite material to form around the forming tool. The chamber is heated to a curing temperature to cure the heated composite material.