Block Copolymer Membrane Crazing for Controlled Pore Formation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current ultrafiltration membranes made from block copolymers (BCP) face high manufacturing costs and laborious processes, limiting their industrial application, and existing pore formation techniques are slow and difficult to control, making them unsuitable for commercialization.

Innovation Solution

A new method involving mechanical stretching of an ultrathin block copolymer film supported on a porous polyethersulfone (PES) substrate under tensile strain to form high-aspect ratio pores, eliminating the need for block removal steps and enabling scalable production of thin, permeable membranes with precise pore sizes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If block copolymer membranes are used to achieve improved ultrafiltration performance, then selectivity and permeability are enhanced, but manufacturing cost and material cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveultrafiltration performanceVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The membrane is divided into two functional segments: a thin block copolymer selective layer (providing ultrafiltration performance) and a thick porous support layer (providing mechanical strength and reducing overall cost). This segmentation allows each layer to be optimized independently for its specific function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention uses a composite structure combining block copolymer material with a porous support material. The block copolymer provides the selective filtration function while the support provides structural integrity, creating a composite membrane that balances performance and cost-effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Manufacturing precision

If traditional pore formation strategies (minor block removal or reconstruction) are used, then pores are created in the block copolymer, but the process is slow and difficult to control

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepore formation controlVSAvoidpore formation speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention replaces complex chemical pore formation processes (block removal or reconstruction) with a simple mechanical stretching process. By applying tensile strain to the block copolymer layer, pores are formed rapidly and controllably through physical deformation rather than slow chemical reactions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The pore formation is achieved by changing the mechanical parameter (applying tensile strain) rather than using chemical parameters. The strain magnitude and direction can be precisely controlled to determine pore size, shape, and distribution, enabling rapid and controllable pore formation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If phase inversion is used for pore formation, then pores are created in the membrane, but large amounts of costly block copolymer are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepore structureVSAvoidblock copolymer amount
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The block copolymer is first deposited as a thin continuous layer on the porous support, establishing the selective layer structure before pore formation. This preliminary deposition uses minimal block copolymer, and subsequent stretching creates pores in this pre-formed layer without requiring additional material.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of using block copolymer to create pores through phase inversion (which consumes large amounts of material), the invention takes out the pore formation step from the material deposition step. The thin block copolymer layer is deposited first, then pores are extracted or created through mechanical stretching of this existing layer.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Productivity

If the selective layer thickness is reduced to improve permeability, then permeability increases, but the layer becomes more fragile and difficult to manufacture

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovepermeabilityVSAvoidlayer stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The invention uses an ultrathin block copolymer film (selective layer) that is flexible and conformal, deposited on a rigid porous support. The thin film provides high permeability while the support provides the mechanical strength and stability, allowing the selective layer to be extremely thin without compromising overall membrane integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Solution Approach 2:

The porous support layer serves multiple functions: it provides mechanical strength to the thin selective layer, acts as a substrate for selective layer deposition, and contributes to overall membrane stability. This multi-functionality allows the selective layer to be made ultrathin for high permeability without sacrificing strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method allows for the rapid creation of cost-effective, scalable BCP membranes with near-complete rejection of 40 nm gold nanoparticles and high permeability, overcoming the limitations of traditional manufacturing processes.

Implementation Method 1

Phase separated block copolymer (BCP) thin films supported on a porous polyethersulfone (PES) support craze under tensile strain, leaving behind pores of predictable size based on initial domain size and extent of strain

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCrazing:

Implementation Method 2

mechanical stretching of an ultrathin block copolymer film supported on a porous polyethersulfone (PES) support

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical support:

Implementation Method 3

Phase separated block copolymer (BCP) thin films

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhase separation:

Data Source

PatentUS12496555B2Block copolymer templated crazing for membrane separation
Publication Date: 2025.12.16 UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI
  • US12496555B2 patent drawing
  • US12496555B2 patent drawing
  • US12496555B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A porous composite ultrafiltration membrane including a block copolymer layer having (a) one or more soft block polymer(s) having an elongation at break of greater than about 50%, as measured by ASTM D638 and an elastic modulus of between 10 MPa to 3 GPa as measured by the ASTM D638 tensile test; and (b) one or more hard block polymer(s) having an elongation at break of less than about 65%, as measured by ASTM D638, and an elastic modulus of higher than 1 GPa as measured by the ASTM D638 tensile test, and a macroporous support layer having a pore size larger than a pore size of the block copolymer layer. Also described is a method for making the porous composite membrane.