Membrane Emulsification for Energetic Material Particle Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for producing particulate energetic material compositions struggle to achieve consistent, narrow particle size distributions, which is crucial for controlling burn rate and ballistic performance, and often involve hazardous handling of solid materials.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the formation of a dispersed phase with an energetic material dissolved in a solvent, followed by the creation of a continuous phase using a porous membrane to exert shear forces on droplets, allowing controlled precipitation and surface coating, resulting in uniform particulate sizes between 1 to 100 microns.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional methods are used to produce particulate energetic material compositions, then production is simpler, but particle size distribution is wide and inconsistent

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparticle size distributionVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The process segments particle formation into distinct phases: droplet formation through porous membrane, shear force application for size control, and separate precipitation/stabilization steps. This segmentation enables precise control over particle size distribution while maintaining manageable process complexity through modular operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A porous membrane acts as an intermediary device between the dispersed phase and continuous phase, enabling controlled droplet formation. The membrane's pore structure serves as a physical mediator that standardizes initial droplet sizes, which then undergo further refinement through shear forces to achieve the desired narrow particle size distribution

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If solid energetic materials are handled directly, then processing is straightforward, but handling risks and hazards increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehandling risksVSAvoidprocessing ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The energetic material is transformed from solid state to dissolved state in a solvent, fundamentally changing its physical parameters. This parameter change (solid→dissolved) eliminates handling risks associated with solid energetic materials while maintaining ease of manufacture through liquid-phase processing, which is inherently safer and more controllable

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

Direct mechanical handling of solid energetic materials is replaced with liquid-phase processing operations. The material is processed in dissolved form through mixing, droplet formation, and precipitation, eliminating the need for mechanical manipulation of sensitive solid particles and thereby reducing handling risks

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Productivity

If particle size is not controlled, then production is faster, but burn rate and ballistic performance cannot be controlled

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction speedVSAvoidparticle size control
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The process applies preliminary action by first forming droplets of controlled size through the porous membrane before precipitation occurs. This preliminary droplet formation step establishes the particle size framework early in the process, enabling subsequent rapid precipitation to proceed while maintaining precise size control, thus achieving both productivity and manufacturing precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method enables the production of energetic material compositions with precise, mono-sized particulates, reducing handling risks and improving performance by controlling particle size and morphology, thus enhancing the safety and effectiveness of energetic formulations.

Implementation Method 1

a shear force is exerted on the forming droplet of dispersed phase material, to furnish a droplet

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShear force: Shear Stress

Implementation Method 2

optionally causing removal of the at least one first solvent to cause precipitation of said energetic material composition in the continuous phase

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPrecipitation: Precipitation

Implementation Method 3

passing the dispersed phase via a micro porous membrane, preferably there is a membrane separating the dispersed phase and continuous phase

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMembrane separation: Semipermeable Membrane

Implementation Method 4

forming a continuous phase, comprising at least one second solvent which is substantially immiscible with said dispersed phase

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEmulsion: Emulsion

Data Source

PatentEP2794518B1Processing explosives
Publication Date: 2018.02.21 ROXEL UK ROCKET MOTORS
  • EP2794518B1 patent drawingFigure 1a~2
  • EP2794518B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP2794518B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

The invention relates to a method of producing a range of particulate energetic materials with tailored particle sizes and extremely narrow particle size distributions. The use of membrane emulsification apparatus provides a means of formulating explosives with a selectable particle size, without the use of milling techniques to physically reduce the size of the particulates.