Membrane Filtration Controller Using Downstream Sensor Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current membrane filtration plants lack an efficient system for monitoring and controlling processes, leading to inefficiencies and increased waste, particularly in optimizing fluid management during flushing processes.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising downstream sensors and a controller that compares characteristics of the feed and permeate/retentate to determine differences and control processes based on predefined thresholds, enabling automated and precise management of membrane filtration operations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual monitoring and control methods are used in membrane filtration plants, then device complexity is reduced, but process efficiency and productivity deteriorate due to lack of real-time optimization

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors fluid characteristics using sensors and feeds this information back to the controller, which automatically adjusts process parameters. This closed-loop feedback mechanism enables real-time optimization of membrane filtration processes, improving productivity while maintaining manageable system complexity through automated control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The membrane filtration plant performs self-monitoring and self-adjustment through the integrated sensor and controller system. The system automatically detects changes in fluid characteristics and adjusts process parameters without external intervention, enabling self-optimization that enhances productivity while reducing the need for complex manual control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Loss of substance

If comprehensive process monitoring is implemented to reduce waste, then loss of substance decreases, but device complexity increases due to additional sensors and control systems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewaste reductionVSAvoidmonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The feedback mechanism continuously monitors fluid characteristics and automatically adjusts process parameters to optimize separation efficiency. This reduces substance loss by ensuring optimal operating conditions are maintained, while the automated nature of the system prevents excessive complexity from accumulating through manual intervention requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The controller system performs multiple functions including data acquisition, analysis, process control, and optimization. By consolidating these functions into a single multi-functional controller rather than separate dedicated systems, the monitoring complexity is managed while achieving comprehensive waste reduction through optimized process parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Loss of time

If real-time automated control is implemented, then loss of time is reduced through faster response, but device complexity increases due to automated control systems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse timeVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The real-time feedback loop continuously monitors fluid characteristics and immediately triggers process adjustments when deviations are detected. This automated response mechanism eliminates time delays associated with manual monitoring and adjustment, reducing loss of time while the systematic nature of the feedback control keeps complexity manageable through standardized control algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual mechanical control operations with automated electronic control through the controller and sensor system. This substitution enables faster response times by eliminating human reaction time delays, while the electronic control system manages complexity through programmable logic and automated decision-making algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Productivity

If process optimization is implemented to reduce downtime, then productivity improves, but device complexity increases due to additional process equipment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedowntime reductionVSAvoidprocess equipment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The feedback system continuously monitors process parameters and predicts when optimization opportunities or issues may arise. By enabling proactive process adjustments, the system reduces downtime through preventive optimization rather than reactive repairs, avoiding the need for additional process equipment while maintaining high productivity through intelligent control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20240216868A1System for monitoring a fluid and controlling a process in a membrane filtration plant
Publication Date: 2024.07.04 GEA LIQUID TECH AS
  • US20240216868A1 patent drawing
  • US20240216868A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for monitoring a fluid and controlling a process in a membrane filtration plant is provided herein. The system comprises includes a feed sensor, a downstream sensor, and a controller.